Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: 파일 읽기 시 Files.exists() 호출 제거를 통한 I/O 최적화 및 TOCTOU 방지 - #209

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-files-exists-io-optimization-4879747086549964714
Closed

⚡ Bolt: 파일 읽기 시 Files.exists() 호출 제거를 통한 I/O 최적화 및 TOCTOU 방지#209
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-files-exists-io-optimization-4879747086549964714

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Superseded by #222.

파일 읽기 작업(Files.lines, bytesReader.read 등) 이전에 존재 여부를 확인하는 Files.exists() 호출을 제거하고,
파일이 존재하지 않을 때 발생하는 java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException을 바로 처리하도록 코드를 변경했습니다.
이로 인해 파일 읽기 전 불필요한 시스템 I/O(stat) 비용을 줄이고 Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use(TOCTOU) 레이스 컨디션을 방지할 수 있습니다.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 26, 2026 21:06
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 21 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0f6e968f-2959-4f5a-bed9-f15f77021951

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae0bc74 and c35f5cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .jules/bolt.md
  • src/main/java/com/clearfolio/viewer/analytics/KpiSnapshotLedger.java
  • src/main/java/com/clearfolio/viewer/artifact/ArtifactLinkLedger.java
  • src/main/java/com/clearfolio/viewer/artifact/FileSystemArtifactStore.java
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch bolt-files-exists-io-optimization-4879747086549964714

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR improves filesystem read paths in clearfolio’s viewer backend by removing preflight Files.exists() checks and instead handling missing-file cases via NoSuchFileException, reducing extra stat calls and avoiding TOCTOU windows.

Changes:

  • FileSystemArtifactStore#getPdf now reads directly and returns Optional.empty() on NoSuchFileException.
  • ArtifactLinkLedger and KpiSnapshotLedger now load by streaming the ledger file directly and treat NoSuchFileException as an empty ledger.
  • Added a Bolt learning note documenting the “don’t pre-check Files.exists(); catch NoSuchFileException” pattern.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
src/main/java/com/clearfolio/viewer/artifact/FileSystemArtifactStore.java Removes Files.exists() pre-check; catches NoSuchFileException to return empty for missing artifacts.
src/main/java/com/clearfolio/viewer/artifact/ArtifactLinkLedger.java Removes Files.exists() pre-check in ledger load; handles missing ledger file via NoSuchFileException.
src/main/java/com/clearfolio/viewer/analytics/KpiSnapshotLedger.java Removes Files.exists() pre-check in ledger load; handles missing ledger file via NoSuchFileException.
.jules/bolt.md Documents the optimization / TOCTOU-avoidance pattern for future reference.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@seonghobae seonghobae closed this Aug 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants