🎨 Palette: 숫자 입력 필드의 빈 문자열 상태 처리 개선 (인라인 유효성 검사 UX 개선)

[seonghobae]

💡 What: 숫자 입력 필드(target_bytes, batch_target_bytes)가 비워져 있을 때 사용자 정의 유효성 검사 오류를 제거하여 네이티브 HTML5 required 제약 조건이 올바르게 동작하도록 수정.
🎯 Why: 기존 코드는 빈 문자열을 파싱할 때 NaN이 반환되어, 값을 지우기만 해도 '0보다 커야 합니다'라는 오류가 즉시 표시됨. 이는 사용자가 새 값을 입력하기 위해 필드를 비우는 과정에서 불필요한 오류 메시지를 보게 하여 UX를 저해함.
📸 Before/After: N/A (동적 상태 변화)
♿ Accessibility: 빈 필드에 대해 aria-invalid 상태가 부적절하게 설정되는 것을 방지하여 스크린 리더 사용자에게 혼란을 주지 않음.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 5411406850956860873 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head d9ed151496c11d05f04bdf4f1000adeb6b0c926b.

• Head SHA: d9ed151496c11d05f04bdf4f1000adeb6b0c926b

• Workflow run: 30505940763

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: d9ed151496c11d05f04bdf4f1000adeb6b0c926b
• Workflow run: 30505940763
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head d9ed151496c11d05f04bdf4f1000adeb6b0c926b.

• Head SHA: d9ed151496c11d05f04bdf4f1000adeb6b0c926b

• Workflow run: 30505940763

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

Closed as a duplicate of #274. The canonical PR preserves this PR's custom-validity and ARIA reset behavior, also resets the associated preset-button state for both single and batch fields, and has a clean current-head CI/fuzz/security review path. The stale OpenCode coverage request on this branch is not reused.

[google-labs-jules]

Closed as a duplicate of #274. The canonical PR preserves this PR's custom-validity and ARIA reset behavior, also resets the associated preset-button state for both single and batch fields, and has a clean current-head CI/fuzz/security review path. The stale OpenCode coverage request on this branch is not reused.

Understood. Acknowledging that this PR has been closed as a duplicate in favor of #274. I will stop work on this task.