🛡️ Sentinel: [MEDIUM] Fix CSP hash mismatch for inline styles

[seonghobae]

🚨 Severity: MEDIUM
💡 Vulnerability: CSP hash for inline styles mismatch due to whitespace and padding issues, causing the browser to block styles and weakening the security posture.
🎯 Impact: Missing or blocked styles can lead to UI regressions and weaken the CSP enforcement for inline elements.
🔧 Fix: Applied .trimIndent() to the CSS content before hashing and removed implicit padding in the <style> template to ensure perfect hash matching with the browser.
✅ Verification: Generated index.html and verified that the CSP hash perfectly matches the inner text of the <style> tag.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 15162116992371821764 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 8 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4bc8f856-0f6c-4130-8a5c-ee1d3c29a83b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a859a11 and ab37d0d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• .gitignore
• .jules/sentinel.md
• src/main/kotlin/html4tree/main.kt

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by #363. Both fix inline-style CSP whitespace/hash mismatch, but #363 additionally hoists the immutable source, independently hashes the exact emitted UTF-8 style text from a real generated page, adds APA 7 doctoring and changelog, and passed fresh exact-head CI/JaCoCo/Security/Semgrep. No result from this head is reused.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as superseded by #363. Both fix inline-style CSP whitespace/hash mismatch, but #363 additionally hoists the immutable source, independently hashes the exact emitted UTF-8 style text from a real generated page, adds APA 7 doctoring and changelog, and passed fresh exact-head CI/JaCoCo/Security/Semgrep. No result from this head is reused.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.