build(deps-dev): Bump certifi from 2026.6.17 to 2026.7.22 in /services/account_unification - #20
Conversation
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
6e74f65cd05547068c4bb5e8149310d7cd6bb22b. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- SAST Semgrep/Semgrep (multi-language SAST): FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/keyverse/actions/runs/29912734235/job/88899283573)
- Semgrep (multi-language SAST) check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/keyverse/actions/runs/29912734235/job/88899283573)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: requirements-dev.txt"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: requirements-dev.txt"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed. Findings1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
Failed checks:
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: requirements-dev.txt"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: requirements-dev.txt"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
6e74f65cd05547068c4bb5e8149310d7cd6bb22b. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- SAST Semgrep/Semgrep (multi-language SAST): FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/keyverse/actions/runs/29912734235/job/88899283573)
- Semgrep (multi-language SAST) check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/keyverse/actions/runs/29912734235/job/88899283573)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: requirements-dev.txt"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: requirements-dev.txt"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
@dependabot rebase |
Bumps [certifi](https://github.com/certifi/python-certifi) from 2026.6.17 to 2026.7.22. - [Commits](certifi/python-certifi@2026.06.17...2026.07.22) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: certifi dependency-version: 2026.7.22 dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
6e74f65 to
6775b50
Compare
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough개발 의존성의 Changescertifi 업데이트
Estimated code review effort: 1 (매우 낮음) | ~2분 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
…certifi-2026.7.22
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@services/account_unification/requirements-dev.txt`:
- Around line 21-23: certifi 의존성 항목을 기준으로 uv.lock의 버전을 2026.7.22로 갱신하고 새 버전에
해당하는 해시를 반영하세요. 세 잠금 파일의 certifi 버전과 해시가 모두 일치하도록 기존 2026.6.17 값과 이전 해시를 제거하세요.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: f53f5ec9-009a-4db0-ad69-01871313e67a
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
services/account_unification/requirements-dev.txt
| certifi==2026.7.22 \ | ||
| --hash=sha256:62f22742b58a1a33014a2b6b706588a8d7e2a88ae7bd1a6ebe8c992928483775 \ | ||
| --hash=sha256:741e2c3b351ddf169a738da9f2c048608ff7f2c5cc02f1ebc6b118bb090d5d55 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -eu
printf '%s\n' '--- tracked lockfiles ---'
git ls-files '*requirements-dev.txt' '*requirements.lock' '*uv.lock' | sort
printf '%s\n' '--- certifi entries ---'
for f in services/account_unification/requirements-dev.txt \
services/account_unification/requirements.lock \
services/account_unification/uv.lock; do
if [ -f "$f" ]; then
printf '\n[%s]\n' "$f"
rg -n -C 3 'certifi|2026\.7\.22|2026\.6\.17|62f22742|741e2c3b' "$f" || true
fi
done
printf '%s\n' '--- uv configuration and usage references ---'
rg -n -C 2 'uv\.lock|uv sync|--locked|requirements-dev\.txt|requirements\.lock' \
services/account_unification .github Makefile pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null || trueRepository: ContextualWisdomLab/keyverse
Length of output: 8179
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -eu
printf '%s\n' '--- project configuration ---'
if [ -f services/account_unification/pyproject.toml ]; then
cat -n services/account_unification/pyproject.toml
fi
printf '%s\n' '--- uv.lock metadata and certifi dependency contexts ---'
cat -n services/account_unification/uv.lock | sed -n '1,75p'
rg -n -C 5 'certifi|requires-dist|resolution-markers|content|revision|name = "account|name = "account-unification' \
services/account_unification/uv.lock
printf '%s\n' '--- repository change summary ---'
git diff --stat -- services/account_unification/requirements-dev.txt \
services/account_unification/requirements.lock \
services/account_unification/uv.lock
git diff --numstat -- services/account_unification/requirements-dev.txt \
services/account_unification/requirements.lock \
services/account_unification/uv.lockRepository: ContextualWisdomLab/keyverse
Length of output: 10048
🌐 Web query:
uv sync --locked behavior lockfile out of date project requirements
💡 Result:
When you use the --locked flag with uv sync, uv strictly requires that the project's lockfile (uv.lock) is both present and fully up-to-date with the current project requirements (e.g., pyproject.toml) [1][2][3]. If the lockfile is missing, or if the dependencies defined in your project configuration have diverged from the locked versions, uv will exit with an error rather than attempting to update the lockfile [1][3][4]. Key aspects of this behavior include: 1. Enforcement of Reproducibility: The --locked flag is primarily used in continuous integration (CI) or automated build environments to ensure that the installed environment exactly matches the committed lockfile [4]. It prevents the tool from silently resolving dependencies or updating the lockfile during the build process [2][4]. 2. Error Handling: If uv detects that the lockfile is stale (i.e., a change was made to pyproject.toml without subsequently running uv lock), it will explicitly output an error message instructing you to run uv lock to regenerate the lockfile [1][5][4]. 3. --locked vs. --frozen: - --locked: Asserts that the lockfile is up-to-date. If it is not, the command fails [2][3]. - --frozen: Skips checking the lockfile against project requirements entirely. It treats the existing uv.lock as the absolute source of truth and will not update it, but it will not error out if the lockfile is out of sync with pyproject.toml [2][3][6]. If you encounter an unexpected "lockfile needs to be updated" error while using --locked, it often indicates either true drift in dependencies or, occasionally, issues with workspace configuration or tool version mismatches [7][5][8]. In such cases, verifying that you are using the same version of uv locally and in your environment, and ensuring that all workspace dependencies are correctly accounted for, is recommended [7][5].
Citations:
- 1: https://docs.astral.sh/uv/concepts/projects/sync/
- 2: https://docs.rs/uv-cli/latest/uv_cli/struct.SyncArgs.html
- 3: https://docs.astral.sh/uv/reference/cli/
- 4: https://latchkey.dev/learn/python/uv-lockfile-out-of-date-frozen
- 5: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79672902/uv-fails-with-locked-even-though-running-without-it-doesnt-change-the-lock
- 6: uv sync should warn (or fail) when lock file is out of sync with pyproject.toml dependency tables astral-sh/uv#11530
- 7: Running
uv sync --lockedin a Dockerfile with workspace dependencies gives "the lockfile atuv.lockneeds to be updated", even though no update is needed astral-sh/uv#16758 - 8: Running
uv sync --lockedasked to update uv.lock even afteruv lockastral-sh/uv#8581
uv.lock을 certifi==2026.7.22로 갱신하세요.
uv.lock은 certifi 2026.6.17과 이전 해시를 고정합니다. CI와 Dockerfile은 uv sync --locked를 사용하므로 이전 버전이 설치됩니다. 세 잠금 파일의 버전과 해시를 일치시키세요.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@services/account_unification/requirements-dev.txt` around lines 21 - 23,
certifi 의존성 항목을 기준으로 uv.lock의 버전을 2026.7.22로 갱신하고 새 버전에 해당하는 해시를 반영하세요. 세 잠금 파일의
certifi 버전과 해시가 모두 일치하도록 기존 2026.6.17 값과 이전 해시를 제거하세요.
5a2d5d3
into
claude/contextualwisdomlab-audit-ci-se85n8
1 participant
Bumps certifi from 2026.6.17 to 2026.7.22.
Commits
f4bc6762026.07.22 (#428)4c91f9cBump actions/setup-python from 6.3.0 to 7.0.0 (#427)01a66c5Bump actions/checkout from 7.0.0 to 7.0.1 (#426)eb355f4Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.14.0 to 1.14.1 (#425)474e6fcInclude tests in the source distribution (#424)a31ef39Bump actions/setup-python from 6.2.0 to 6.3.0 (#420)98eb2c7Bump actions/checkout from 6.0.3 to 7.0.0 (#419)Summary by CodeRabbit