Open
Conversation
Fixed: Spelling issues, unnatural language sytnax, missing entries.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes does this PR introduce?
Fixed: Spelling issues, unnatural language syntax and missing entries in the Polish translation.
Any background context you want to provide?
I downloaded UserLAnd and noticed that the Polish translation has multiple issues, which triggered my OCD to the point that I decided to create this pull request.
Where should the reviewer start?
No idea, unless they're Polish. Then start from the... start.
Has this been manually tested? How?
Not source code, but my guinea pig says it's ok.
What value does this provide to our end users?
I believe that this PR will reduce metaphysical retardation events among the Polish UserLAnd userbase.
What GIF best describes this PR or how it makes you feel?
...what kind of a contributor interview is this?