Skip to content

Bugfix: checkmarx parser - datetime is no longer put into the Finding.date field#9570

Merged
mtesauro merged 2 commits into
DefectDojo:bugfixfrom
reichertan:bugfix-checkmarx-parser-date
Mar 6, 2024
Merged

Bugfix: checkmarx parser - datetime is no longer put into the Finding.date field#9570
mtesauro merged 2 commits into
DefectDojo:bugfixfrom
reichertan:bugfix-checkmarx-parser-date

Conversation

@reichertan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description
We could no longer import Checkmarx reports because the finding date field had a datetime value. This fix resolves the issue.

checkmarx_import_error

@dryrunsecurity
Copy link
Copy Markdown

dryrunsecurity Bot commented Feb 16, 2024

Contextual Security Analysis

As DryRun Security performs checks, we’ll summarize them here. You can always dive into the detailed results in the section below for checks.

Status DryRun Security Check
Sensitive Functions Analyzer
Configured Sensitive Files Analyzer
Sensitive Files Analyzer

Chat with your AI-powered Security Buddy by typing @dryrunsecurity followed by your question into a comment.
Example: @dryrunsecurity What are common security issues with web application cookies?

Install and configure more repositories at DryRun Security

@reichertan reichertan changed the title Checkmarx parser: datetime is no longer put into the Finding.date field Bugfix: checkmarx parser - datetime is no longer put into the Finding.date field Feb 16, 2024
Comment thread unittests/tools/test_checkmarx_parser.py Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mtesauro mtesauro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@mtesauro mtesauro merged commit 370cffb into DefectDojo:bugfix Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants