-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Issue #1290 infiltration from imod5 #1291
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
JoerivanEngelen
merged 11 commits into
issue_#1260_from_imod5_data_metaswap
from
issue_#1290_infiltration_from_imod5
Nov 15, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2bb4254
Require subunit coord for upward- and downward resistance and add fro…
JoerivanEngelen 4a39ba0
Merge branch 'issue_#1260_from_imod5_data_metaswap' into issue_#1290_…
JoerivanEngelen c481270
Use concat_imod5 method
JoerivanEngelen 6d2105b
Remove unused arg in docstring
JoerivanEngelen 7051df7
Remove line
JoerivanEngelen 747ffe9
Add test for from_imod5_data
JoerivanEngelen df6d526
type annotate, and select subunit
JoerivanEngelen 35389bb
Fix tests
JoerivanEngelen 09c32ca
Deactivate small resistances and add cases
JoerivanEngelen 72effc4
Update model fixture
JoerivanEngelen a7a32a5
Update changelog
JoerivanEngelen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think run-on needs to have a dash in it. At least that's what i find online. The weird thing is that it is not needed for runoff
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Weird! I think I prefer keeping the naming consistent (i.e. "runon" and "runoff"), as I like consistency and python variable names cannot contain a dash