Hi everone,
Related to the PR ESMValGroup/ESMValTool#1015. That PR address the problems with UKESM & MIROC6. The problem both of these models was that they used the terms latitude and longitude instead of lat & lon.
The other models that are available now on JASMIN are:
- CESM2
- CNRM-CM6-1
- GISS-E2-1-G
These three all seem to work fine with ESMValTool at the moment!
The models below don't work at the moment, and I'm not sure how to address their problems.
- BCC-CSM2-MR
- BCC-ESM1
- IPSL-CM6A-LR
The two BCC models use irregular grids, however they haven't used the standard terms to describe latitude, longitude, cell index along first dimension and cell index along second dimension (lat, lon and i ,j). Instead they have used: lat, lon and latitude ,longitude). Basically, this is rather confusing because latitude is a 2D array and lat is a one D array. I don't think iris is very happy with this dataset. This causes the following error message:
esmvaltool.cmor.check.CMORCheckError: There were errors in variable tos:
tos: does not match coordinate rank: 3 != 1
The IPSL dataset includes the terms nav_lat and nav_lon instead of lat and lon, which is annoying but not the end of the world. The files I'm looking at also include an area array (instead of areacello) which causes trouble when loading the cube, because it wants to load the netcdf as a list of cubes instead of as a single cube. This produces the error:
ValueError: Cubes were not reduced to one afterfixing:
0: cell_area / (m2) (-- : 332; -- : 362)
1: sea_surface_temperature / (degC) (time: 1980; -- : 332; -- : 362)
Anyone have any ideas how to address these issues?
Hi everone,
Related to the PR ESMValGroup/ESMValTool#1015. That PR address the problems with UKESM & MIROC6. The problem both of these models was that they used the terms
latitudeandlongitudeinstead oflat&lon.The other models that are available now on JASMIN are:
These three all seem to work fine with ESMValTool at the moment!
The models below don't work at the moment, and I'm not sure how to address their problems.
The two BCC models use irregular grids, however they haven't used the standard terms to describe latitude, longitude, cell index along first dimension and cell index along second dimension (
lat,lonandi,j). Instead they have used:lat,lonandlatitude,longitude). Basically, this is rather confusing becauselatitudeis a 2D array andlatis a one D array. I don't think iris is very happy with this dataset. This causes the following error message:The IPSL dataset includes the terms
nav_latandnav_loninstead oflatandlon, which is annoying but not the end of the world. The files I'm looking at also include anareaarray (instead ofareacello) which causes trouble when loading the cube, because it wants to load the netcdf as a list of cubes instead of as a single cube. This produces the error:Anyone have any ideas how to address these issues?