[WIP] Add hashing changes for performance validation#3
Closed
Copilot wants to merge 10000 commits into
Closed
Conversation
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks for asking me to work on this. I will get started on it and keep this PR's description up to date as I form a plan and make progress.
Original prompt
please take only Hashing changes (don't remove other changes for now, just don't commit them) and send a PR to dotnet/runtime. Use the benchmark skill to validate perf impact.
[Chronological Review] 1. Initial request: User asked to create a plan to find and fix trivially-replaceable unsafe code in dotnet/runtime Libraries and CoreLib 2. Phase 1 - Exploration: Launched multiple parallel explore agents to search for unsafe patterns (pointers, fixed, Unsafe.*, MemoryMarshal.*, Marshal.*) 3. Phase 2 - Verification: Launched additional agents to verify specific candidates, check build contexts, determine which polyfill files are netstandard2.0-only 4. Phase 3 - First plan: Created plan with 4 items including Enum.cs (Unsafe.As replacement) and Hashing.cs (MemoryMarshal.Cast) 5. Phase 4 - Plan rejected: User rejected because replacing unsafe with Unsafe.As/MemoryMarshal is NOT acceptable. User wants truly safe code only (Span, indexing, etc.) 6. Phase 5 - Re-search: Launched new agents to find truly safe replacements 7. Phase 6 - Updated plan: Created corrected plan with 4 truly safe changes (FixedBufferExtensions, WebHeaderEncoding, StringParser, Hashing) 8. Phase 7 - Plan approved, autopilot mode: Implemented all 4 changes 9. Phase 8 - Build & test: All builds passed, 24,819 tests passed across 4 test suites 10. Phase 9 - Code review: Performed code review, all changes approved 11. Phase 10 - User returned, asked if still working. Marked task complete. 12. Phase 11 - User had modified GetHashCodeOrdinal's default case to a simpler for-loop shape, asked me to do the same for GetHashCodeOrdinalIgnoreCaseAscii 13. Phase 12 - Updated IgnoreCase method to match. Built & tested (22,068 tests pass). 14. Phase 13 - User asked to save all changes EXCEPT Hashing.cs to a .diff patch file, keeping only Hashing.cs modified 15. Phase 14 - Created non-hashing-unsafe-cleanup.diff, reverted the 3 non-Hashing files. Only Hashing.cs remains modified.[Intent Mapping]
[Technical Inventory]
dotnet build <project>.csprojdotnet build /t:test <test-project>.csproj[Code Archaeology]
unsafe,fixed,MemoryMarshal.GetReference, replaced withspan.Slice(0, len).ToString()— REVERTED, saved to patchunsafe,fixedpointer loops, replaced with Span indexing — REVERTED, saved to patchunsafe,fixed(char* bufferPtr = _buffer), replaced with_buffer.AsSpan()indexing in 4 methods — REVERTED, saved to patchunsafe,fixed,MemoryMarshal.GetReference,(uint*)pointer casts. Replaced with span indexing + bit packing((uint)s[i] | ((uint)s[i+1] << 16)). User then modified GetHashCodeOrdinal default case to usefor (; i < s.Length - 3; i += 4)shape. I matched that shape in GetHashCodeOrdinalIgnoreCaseAscii. — STILL MODIFIED[Progress Assessment]
[Context Validation]
[Recent Commands Analysis]
git diffto create patch of 3 non-Hashing files → saved to .diff, thengit checkout --to revert those 3 files, thengit diff --statconfirming only Hashing.cs remains modified1. Conversation Overview: - Primary Objectives: User requested: "Please walk over the codebase and try to find places with unsafe code that you can trivially make safe." Specifically targeting: 1) unmanaged pointers/dereferencing/fixed statements, 2) Unsafe, MemoryMarshal, Marshal APIs. Rules: trivial changes only, ignore interop/pinvokes, focus on optimization-related unsafe code replaceable with Span, only Libraries and CoreLib (no tests/samples/tools/mono/nativeaot), no git commits. - Session Context: Explored do...
Created from Copilot CLI via the copilot delegate command.
📍 Connect Copilot coding agent with Jira, Azure Boards or Linear to delegate work to Copilot in one click without leaving your project management tool.