Fix: When the language changes, we should not change the focused index in a list by ShogunFire · Pull Request #23117 · Expensify/App

ShogunFire · 2023-07-18T18:11:22Z

Details

We check if the upadte is due to a language change and if it's the case we don't change the focused index in a list, we still update the list just in case in the future options are translated

Fixed Issues

$ #21538
PROPOSAL: #21538 (comment)

Tests

Open the app in two devices or tab A and B (same user)
In tab A click on the fab button
Select Request money
Type an amount and click on Next
On the particpants list focus a participant without selecting it, with the arrows of the keyboard for example (I am not sure how to do it for device without keyboard)
Go to tab B and change the language in setings
Verify that the participant that was highlighted is still highlighted

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

No Offline test because the language change will not be seen on tab A

QA Steps

Open the app in two devices or tab A and B (same user)
In tab A click on the fab button
Select Request money
Type an amount and click on Next
On the particpants list focus a participant without selecting it, with the arrows of the keyboard for example (I am not sure how to do it for device without keyboard)
Go to tab B and change the language in setings
Verify that the participant that was highlighted is still highlighted

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Web

web.mp4

Mobile Web - Chrome

mweb.mp4

Mobile Web - Safari

safari.mp4

Desktop

desktop.mp4

iOS

ios.mp4

Android

android.mp4

…x in a list Signed-off-by: Pierre Michel <pmiche04@gmail.com>

melvin-bot · 2023-07-18T18:11:27Z

@aimane-chnaif Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Signed-off-by: Pierre Michel <pmiche04@gmail.com>

ShogunFire · 2023-07-18T18:40:38Z

@aimane-chnaif PR ready for review

aimane-chnaif

please update PR title to be fully shown

Signed-off-by: Pierre Michel <pmiche04@gmail.com>

ShogunFire · 2023-07-19T14:56:56Z

I made the changes

aimane-chnaif · 2023-07-20T22:20:28Z

Server seems down right now, sign in not working at all

aimane-chnaif · 2023-07-20T23:18:31Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.