Reintroduce receipt recovery skipping distance requests by Gonals · Pull Request #32562 · Expensify/App

Gonals · 2023-12-06T12:30:44Z

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #28884
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Open a chat in NewDot and click + -> Request Money -> Scan and upload a file that will fail in the backend. This corrupt file works:
CORRUPT.pdf
Open the Money Request report chat. After a second or two, the request should fail and you should see this message:

Click on it and confirm you can download the file (Note that. refreshing or closing the app will make the file unavailable)
Go offline.
Create a Distance Money request through > + > Request money > Distance.
Enter vague addresses - SF for Start and LA for Finish point.
Create the Distance expense.
Go online.
Confirm the error is not the receipt-related one:

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

No changes

QA Steps

Same as tests

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

MacOS: Desktop

melvin-bot · 2023-12-06T12:30:49Z

@0xmiroslav Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

trjExpensify · 2023-12-13T22:00:59Z

Hey @0xmiroslav if you haven't got the capacity to review this, can you please speak up so we can find another volunteer? Thanks!

situchan · 2023-12-13T22:04:13Z

I can do quick review if needed

0xmiroslav · 2023-12-14T08:34:57Z

@situchan go ahead. thanks

trjExpensify · 2023-12-14T09:28:18Z

Perfect, assigned you @situchan. Thanks!

situchan · 2023-12-14T13:55:44Z

@Gonals please merge main as 1.7k commits are behind

Gonals · 2023-12-15T14:43:55Z

@Gonals please merge main as 1.7k commits are behind

Done

Gonals · 2023-12-19T12:17:55Z

@situchan bump!

situchan · 2023-12-19T14:22:58Z

Confirmed these don't happen anymore

[$500] IOU - After an IOU SmartScan creation error, the file is not downloaded #31845
[HOLD for payment 2023-12-06] [HOLD for payment 2023-12-04] Distance - Wrong error message is shown when creating an invalid distance request #31834

situchan · 2023-12-19T14:23:57Z

While testing distance request, got weird bug of showing as if scan request:

Expected:

situchan · 2023-12-19T14:48:00Z

It's strange.
I reproduced this bug on this branch.
Switched to main branch to see if it's existing bug. But not reproducible.
And then switched to this branch and no longer reproducible.

Gonals · 2023-12-20T11:01:31Z

It's strange. I reproduced this bug on this branch. Switched to main branch to see if it's existing bug. But not reproducible. And then switched to this branch and no longer reproducible.

Maybe just some backend downtime? 🤷

situchan · 2023-12-20T11:04:56Z

It's strange. I reproduced this bug on this branch. Switched to main branch to see if it's existing bug. But not reproducible. And then switched to this branch and no longer reproducible.

Maybe just some backend downtime? 🤷

No, it already happened optimistically (before api call)

Gonals · 2023-12-20T11:12:21Z

It's strange. I reproduced this bug on this branch. Switched to main branch to see if it's existing bug. But not reproducible. And then switched to this branch and no longer reproducible.

Maybe just some backend downtime? 🤷

No, it already happened optimistically (before api call)

Huh. Weird.
Well, it displays the expected error! 😁

Gonals · 2023-12-27T11:31:31Z

@situchan, bump!

situchan · 2024-01-03T09:47:36Z

I am trying to reproduce #31834 in the case of split distance request which is not handled in this PR. But the error doesn't come from backend so not able to test.

split.distance.mov

situchan · 2024-01-03T09:53:38Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

android.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

ios.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

msafari.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

web-manual.mov

web-scan.mov

web-split-manual.mov

web-split-scan.mov

MacOS: Desktop

desktop.mov

situchan · 2024-01-03T10:27:23Z

Requesting money to new user doesn't work. Report error instead of report action error.

mchrome.mov

situchan

Approving in case above issues are out of scope

melvin-bot · 2024-01-03T10:29:22Z

@NikkiWines Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Gonals · 2024-01-03T12:06:54Z

Approving in case above issues are out of scope

Yep. I don't think they are related

NikkiWines

Looks good 👍

OSBotify · 2024-01-03T17:04:45Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify · 2024-01-04T19:03:03Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/NikkiWines in version: 1.4.22-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2024-01-04T20:10:40Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/NikkiWines in version: 1.4.22-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2024-01-09T05:19:20Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.4.22-6 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

Gonals added 2 commits December 6, 2023 13:21

Reintroduce receipt recovery skipping distance requests

5e30ceb

ensure we use the right filename

3ed998a

Gonals self-assigned this Dec 6, 2023

Gonals requested a review from a team as a code owner December 6, 2023 12:30

melvin-bot Bot requested review from 0xmiroslav and removed request for a team December 6, 2023 12:30

text style

d654bdf

trjExpensify mentioned this pull request Dec 6, 2023

[HOLD for payment 2024-02-07] [$500] IOU - Replacing Receipt with an Invalid File Format Does Not Display an Error Message #28343

Closed

6 tasks

trjExpensify requested review from situchan and removed request for 0xmiroslav December 14, 2023 09:28

Merge branch 'main' into alberto-fixReceiptError

c3885d7

typescript

40e937f

situchan reviewed Dec 19, 2023

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/libs/actions/IOU.js Outdated

Gonals added 2 commits December 20, 2023 12:10

use isScanRequest

8c9139a

imports

f94c41f

Merge branch 'main' into alberto-fixReceiptError

d9007f3

situchan approved these changes Jan 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot Bot requested a review from NikkiWines January 3, 2024 10:29

trjExpensify mentioned this pull request Jan 3, 2024

[HOLD for payment 2023-12-04] [SMARTSCAN] MEDIUM: Allow users to re-download receipt if upload fails #28884

Closed

NikkiWines approved these changes Jan 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

NikkiWines merged commit b3f1456 into main Jan 3, 2024

NikkiWines deleted the alberto-fixReceiptError branch January 3, 2024 17:00

github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Jan 4, 2024

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-01-04 #33973

Closed

74 tasks

lanitochka17 mentioned this pull request Jan 5, 2024

[LOW] [Splits] [$500] Mweb/Chrome - Scan request created using corrupt pdf displays incorrect error message #34032

Closed

6 tasks

Conversation

Gonals commented Dec 6, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

melvin-bot Bot commented Dec 6, 2023

Uh oh!

trjExpensify commented Dec 13, 2023

Uh oh!

situchan commented Dec 13, 2023

Uh oh!

0xmiroslav commented Dec 14, 2023

Uh oh!

trjExpensify commented Dec 14, 2023

Uh oh!

situchan commented Dec 14, 2023

Uh oh!

Gonals commented Dec 15, 2023

Uh oh!

Gonals commented Dec 19, 2023

Uh oh!

situchan commented Dec 19, 2023

Uh oh!

situchan commented Dec 19, 2023

Uh oh!

situchan commented Dec 19, 2023

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Gonals commented Dec 20, 2023

Uh oh!

situchan commented Dec 20, 2023

Uh oh!

Gonals commented Dec 20, 2023

Uh oh!

Gonals commented Dec 27, 2023

Uh oh!

situchan commented Jan 3, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

situchan commented Jan 3, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

situchan commented Jan 3, 2024

Uh oh!

situchan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

melvin-bot Bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Uh oh!

Gonals commented Jan 3, 2024

Uh oh!

NikkiWines left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Jan 3, 2024

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Jan 4, 2024

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Jan 4, 2024

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Jan 9, 2024

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

Gonals commented Dec 6, 2023 •

edited

Loading

situchan commented Jan 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

situchan commented Jan 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading