Skip to content

[TS migration] Migrate 'SignInDesktop' page#35406

Merged
youssef-lr merged 11 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
brunovjk:ts-migration/31988
Feb 12, 2024
Merged

[TS migration] Migrate 'SignInDesktop' page#35406
youssef-lr merged 11 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
brunovjk:ts-migration/31988

Conversation

@brunovjk

@brunovjk brunovjk commented Jan 30, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Details

[TS migration] Migrate 'SignInDesktop' page, files:

src/pages/signin/DesktopRedirectPage.js
src/pages/signin/GoogleSignInDesktopPage/index.website.js
src/pages/signin/GoogleSignInDesktopPage/index.js
src/pages/signin/DesktopSignInRedirectPage/index.website.js
src/pages/signin/DesktopSignInRedirectPage/index.js
src/pages/signin/AppleSignInDesktopPage/index.website.js
src/pages/signin/AppleSignInDesktopPage/index.js

Fixed Issues

$ #31988
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Pre-condition:

  1. Render the web Sign In with Google button in Development. APPLE_GOOGLE_SIGNIN.md#render-the-web-sign-in-with-google-button-in-development
  2. Update newExpensifyURL so we can use https://dev.new.expensify.com:8083 in place of https://new.expensify.com/
  3. Start Dektop App (npm run desktop) at :8082.
  4. Start Web App (npm run web) at :8083.
  5. Manually login with any google account to the Web App (dev.new.expensify.com:8083). Don't use the Google Sign Button, it won't work.
  6. Update the webpack.dev.js config to change host from dev.new.expensify.com to localhost and server type from https to http. APPLE_GOOGLE_SIGNIN.md#hostport-requirements

Steps to test:

  1. Go to the Desktop App and click on the Google SignIn button.
  2. Verify that you have been redirected to .../sign-in-with-google and the URL automatically updates to .../desktop-signin-redirect.
  3. Click on Try Again to be redirected to the Desktop App.
  4. Verify that we are logged into DesktopApp with the same account we used in Pre-condition Step 5.
  5. Logout in the DektopApp.
  6. In the Desktop App click on the Apple SignIn button.
  7. Verify that you have been redirected to .../sign-in-with-apple and the URL automatically updates to .../desktop-signin-redirect.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Google SignIn

  1. Sign out of Desktop and Web apps
  2. Go to the Desktop app and click on the Google SignIn button.
  3. Verify that you have been redirected to the URL .../sign-in-with-google in the browser
  4. Login with a Google Account and verify that URL automatically updates to .../desktop-signin-redirect.
  5. Verify that it is directed to Desktop app. (If there is a prompt to open on Desktop app click on the prompt to redirect to Desktop app)
  6. Verify that we are logged into Desktop app with the same account logged in at Step 4

Apple Signin

  1. Sign out of Desktop and Web apps
  2. Go to the Desktop app and click on the Apple SignIn button.
  3. Verify that you have been redirected to the URL .../sign-in-with-apple in the browser
  4. Login with an Apple Account and verify that URL automatically updates to .../desktop-signin-redirect.
  5. Verify that it is directed to Desktop app. (If there is a prompt to open on Desktop app click on the prompt to redirect to Desktop app)
  6. Verify that we are logged into Desktop app with the same account logged in at Step 4

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

N/A

Android: mWeb Chrome

N/A

iOS: Native

N/A

iOS: mWeb Safari

N/A

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

N/A

MacOS: Desktop
MacOS_.Desktop.-Ts.migration_31988.mp4

@brunovjk brunovjk marked this pull request as ready for review January 31, 2024 15:40
@brunovjk brunovjk requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2024 15:40
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team January 31, 2024 15:40
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@c3024 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from c3024 January 31, 2024 15:40
@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Feb 1, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I still haven't managed to enable SSO options on my local dev. https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1706821021396549
Done

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Feb 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@c3024 The changes that I believe are necessary, following the TypeScript's style guide, have already been made.
Currently working on Steps test and POCs. Can you help me here? I'm not sure what steps to test these files we should use. What is the 'user Flow' here?
Thanks for the help.

@brunovjk brunovjk marked this pull request as draft February 2, 2024 13:53
@c3024

c3024 commented Feb 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@brunovjk Sorry, could not respond to your earlier pings. I've been checking other PRs. I'll check and get back in a few hours.

@c3024

c3024 commented Feb 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think visiting these routes

App/src/ROUTES.ts

Lines 50 to 52 in 3ab4e6e

APPLE_SIGN_IN: 'sign-in-with-apple',
GOOGLE_SIGN_IN: 'sign-in-with-google',
DESKTOP_SIGN_IN_REDIRECT: 'desktop-signin-redirect',

because the third party desktop signin screens correspond to these routes

[SCREENS.SIGN_IN_WITH_APPLE_DESKTOP]: ROUTES.APPLE_SIGN_IN,
[SCREENS.SIGN_IN_WITH_GOOGLE_DESKTOP]: ROUTES.GOOGLE_SIGN_IN,

and checking if they are working as expected with nothing broken and no new console warnings and errors should do.

You might want to modify this line for dekstop prompt in dev environment.

if (!isMacOSWeb() || isUnsupportedDeeplinkRoute || hasShownPrompt || CONFIG.ENVIRONMENT === CONST.ENVIRONMENT.DEV || autoAuthState === CONST.AUTO_AUTH_STATE.NOT_STARTED) {

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Feb 5, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thank you @c3024 I saw your message before, still working on those tests. This PR will be ready for review soon. At the latest by the end of this week 02/09, but I believe sooner.

@brunovjk brunovjk changed the title Ts migration/31988 [TS migration] Migrate 'SignInDesktop' page Feb 7, 2024
@brunovjk brunovjk marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2024 12:52
@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Feb 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@c3024 The PR is ready for review.

@c3024

c3024 commented Feb 11, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In the pre-condition, at this step

Login with any google account to the Web App (dev.new.expensify.com:8083)

I am not able to login with a Google account on web. I am getting a blank white screen.

blankGoogle.mp4

I followed all the preceding steps in the pre-condition. Could you help me with this? @brunovjk

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Feb 11, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@c3024 Thanks for the review. My bad, I didn't make it so clear, that in Pre-condition-step 5 I logged in with a Google account not through the GoogleSignIn Button, but I entered the account manually, I fixed now, but during the tests I did, I tested several 'Step test Path', none led to accurate reproduction, but none had a failure or error in relation to TS migration. Actually I'm not very happy with these steps, I'll redo/improve it and let you know. If you have any ideas please don't hesitate to let me know. Do you think we can/should ask an Internal Engineer for help with the tests here?

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hello @blazejkustra were you able to test using the steps I provided? Thank you :D

@blazejkustra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, I only reviewed typescript-wise @brunovjk 😄

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Feb 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Nice, thank you @blazejkustra. I agree, the TS migration is looking good. I will keep working on those steps today, I believe it is important for the QA team.

@c3024

c3024 commented Feb 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop
signinDesktop.mp4

@c3024

c3024 commented Feb 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think the test steps cover well enough to verify the changes made.

@c3024 c3024 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Feb 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #31988 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@c3024 c3024 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from youssef-lr February 12, 2024 18:02

@youssef-lr youssef-lr left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@youssef-lr youssef-lr merged commit 5aee9a3 into Expensify:main Feb 12, 2024
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@brunovjk brunovjk deleted the ts-migration/31988 branch February 12, 2024 22:34
@kavimuru

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@youssef-lr @c3024 Could you help with "Precondition" part for the QA team?

@c3024

c3024 commented Feb 14, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

My bad @kavimuru . The QA steps do not require the pre-condition because the buttons are already rendered. Please follow the following steps.

QA steps

Google SignIn

  1. Sign out of Desktop and Web apps
  2. Go to the Desktop app and click on the Google SignIn button.
  3. Verify that you have been redirected to the URL .../sign-in-with-google in the browser
  4. Login with a Google Account and verify that URL automatically updates to .../desktop-signin-redirect.
  5. Verify that it is directed to Desktop app. (If there is a prompt to open on Desktop app click on the prompt to redirect to Desktop app)
  6. Verify that we are logged into Desktop app with the same account logged in at Step 4

Apple Signin

  1. Sign out of Desktop and Web apps
  2. Go to the Desktop app and click on the Apple SignIn button.
  3. Verify that you have been redirected to the URL .../sign-in-with-apple in the browser
  4. Login with an Apple Account and verify that URL automatically updates to .../desktop-signin-redirect.
  5. Verify that it is directed to Desktop app. (If there is a prompt to open on Desktop app click on the prompt to redirect to Desktop app)
  6. Verify that we are logged into Desktop app with the same account logged in at Step 4

@c3024

c3024 commented Feb 14, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please suggest any corrections if required here #35406 (comment).

@brunovjk

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Feb 14, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

True, we don't need pre-conditioning for QA tests, I hadn't realized that, thank you @c3024. Should I edit the PR 'Details' with these QA steps? They look good to me.

@c3024

c3024 commented Feb 14, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I thought we cannot edit the earlier comments after PR has been merged. If we can, please edit and include the steps.

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Done :)

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.4.41-12 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants