[CP Staging] Fix problem with non-worklet tooltip and switch with update modal by sumo-slonik · Pull Request #53379 · Expensify/App

sumo-slonik · 2024-12-02T11:55:57Z

Explanation of Change

Fix error with switch after opening upgrate window

Fixed Issues

$ #53447

PROPOSAL:
Unnecessary

Tests

Go to the More Features tab.
Click the switch for Credit Card or Workflows.
Close the Upgrade window.

Expected:
The switch should remain false when the window is closed without any action.

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Unnecessary

QA Steps

Same as tests

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-12-02.at.13.50.45.mp4

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-12-02.at.13.53.54.mp4

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-12-02.at.13.48.06.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-12-02.at.13.43.01.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-12-02.at.13.38.23.mp4

MacOS: Desktop

Screen.Recording.2024-12-02.at.13.56.16.mp4

melvin-bot · 2024-12-02T13:14:11Z

@shubham1206agra Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

shawnborton · 2024-12-02T14:15:49Z

Is there anything needed from a design-perspective here?

blazejkustra · 2024-12-02T14:19:58Z

@shawnborton No 😄

shubham1206agra · 2024-12-03T08:34:01Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-12-03.at.1.36.58.PM.mov

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-12-03.at.2.00.43.PM.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-12-03.at.1.36.58.PM.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-12-03.at.1.32.46.PM.mov

MacOS: Desktop

Screen.Recording.2024-12-03.at.1.39.39.PM.mov

mountiny

LGTM, thanks!

OSBotify · 2024-12-03T11:58:24Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

…reanimate-bugfixs [CP Staging] Fix problem with non-worklet tooltip and switch with update modal (cherry picked from commit 4195ffc) (CP triggered by mountiny)

github-actions · 2024-12-03T12:35:35Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.0.70-2 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	false ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

github-actions · 2024-12-04T01:12:29Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.0.70-9 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	skipped 🚫
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	failure ❌

situchan · 2026-03-18T03:23:43Z


+    useEffect(() => {
+        offsetX.set(withTiming(isOn ? OFFSET_X.ON : OFFSET_X.OFF, {duration: 300}));
+    }, [isOn, offsetX]);


This effect caused minor bug.
More details: #79863 (comment), #79863 (comment)

fix problem with non-worklet tooltip and switch with update modal

0bb83d9

blazejkustra approved these changes Dec 2, 2024

View reviewed changes

fix linter

be2a653

sumo-slonik marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2024 13:14

sumo-slonik requested review from a team as code owners December 2, 2024 13:14

melvin-bot Bot requested review from shubham1206agra and removed request for a team December 2, 2024 13:14

sumo-slonik mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2024

[Due for payment 2025-02-28] Replace react-native Animated API with react-native-reanimated #52920

Closed

shubham1206agra approved these changes Dec 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot Bot requested a review from mountiny December 3, 2024 08:34

mountiny assigned sumo-slonik Dec 3, 2024

mountiny changed the title ~~Fix problem with non-worklet tooltip and switch with update modal~~ [CP Staging] Fix problem with non-worklet tooltip and switch with update modal Dec 3, 2024

mountiny mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2024

[HOLD for payment 2024-12-12] [HOLD for payment 2024-12-11] Switch is stuck in one state #53447

Closed

8 tasks

mountiny approved these changes Dec 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

mountiny merged commit 4195ffc into Expensify:main Dec 3, 2024

github-actions Bot added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Dec 3, 2024

github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2024

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-12-02 #53406

Closed

48 tasks

MelvinBot mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2026

[Due for payment 2026-03-17] [$250] Category-Category toggle visually switches while scrolling #79863

Closed

7 tasks

situchan reviewed Mar 18, 2026

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[CP Staging] Fix problem with non-worklet tooltip and switch with update modal#53379

[CP Staging] Fix problem with non-worklet tooltip and switch with update modal#53379
mountiny merged 2 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:migrate/animate-reanimate-bugfixs

sumo-slonik commented Dec 2, 2024 •

edited by mountiny

Loading

Uh oh!

melvin-bot Bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Uh oh!

shawnborton commented Dec 2, 2024

Uh oh!

blazejkustra commented Dec 2, 2024

Uh oh!

shubham1206agra commented Dec 3, 2024

Uh oh!

mountiny left a comment

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 3, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Uh oh!

situchan Mar 18, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants

Conversation

sumo-slonik commented Dec 2, 2024 • edited by mountiny Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

melvin-bot Bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Uh oh!

shawnborton commented Dec 2, 2024

Uh oh!

blazejkustra commented Dec 2, 2024

Uh oh!

shubham1206agra commented Dec 3, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 3, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Uh oh!

situchan Mar 18, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants

sumo-slonik commented Dec 2, 2024 •

edited by mountiny

Loading