Skip to content

Fix: Delete workspace flow#59162

Merged
mountiny merged 3 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:@adamgrzybowski/fix-delete-workspace-flow
Apr 17, 2025
Merged

Fix: Delete workspace flow#59162
mountiny merged 3 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:@adamgrzybowski/fix-delete-workspace-flow

Conversation

@adamgrzybowski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

This PR is part of the PR that was reverted #58382

This part doesn't have the issue that was pointed out as a reason to revert.

It has two main components:

  • a patch to the @react-navigation/native to fix a bug related to finding history entries corresponding to the current URL.
  • change navigate to goBack after finishing the delete workspace flow.

It was originally created to cover this issue #56813
But it covers this one as well #57697

Important

This PR includes a patch. Make sure to reinstall node_modules

Fixed Issues

$ #56813
$ #57697

PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Test delete workspace flow

  1. Open the staging.new.expensify.com website.
  2. Create a new workspace
  3. Disable internet
  4. Open the new workspace's settings
  5. Navigate to overview
  6. Press delete and confirm
  7. Use the device / browser back button
  8. Make sure that you don't see 'Not found;

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
androidWeb2.mp4
iOS: Native
ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web2.mp4
MacOS: Desktop

@adamgrzybowski adamgrzybowski requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2025 14:47
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from jayeshmangwani March 26, 2025 14:47
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Mar 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jayeshmangwani Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team March 26, 2025 14:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dukenv0307 As you reviewed the PR #58382 that was raised earlier, I wanted to confirm—are you planning to review this PR as well?

cc: @mountiny

@mountiny mountiny self-assigned this Mar 26, 2025
@mountiny mountiny requested review from dukenv0307 and removed request for jayeshmangwani March 26, 2025 22:44
@mountiny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Makes sense

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test app build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
❌ FAILED ❌ ❌ FAILED ❌
The QR code can't be generated, because the Android build failed The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Android Hybrid 🤖🔄 iOS Hybrid 🍎🔄
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/59162-hybrid/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/59162-hybrid/index.html
Android Hybrid iOS Hybrid
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/59162/NewExpensify.dmg https://59162.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@dukenv0307

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shubham1206agra Can you help review this PR? I'm stuck on other issues

@mountiny mountiny assigned adamgrzybowski and unassigned mountiny Mar 27, 2025
@mountiny mountiny requested review from shubham1206agra and removed request for dukenv0307 March 27, 2025 19:50
@mountiny

mountiny commented Apr 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shubham1206agra @adamgrzybowski What's up with this one?

@mountiny

mountiny commented Apr 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shubham1206agra I think we can go ahead with this change and @adamgrzybowski will create the upstream issue and fix once he is back from ooo

@mountiny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@adamgrzybowski can you please create the upstream issue and PR and link it here? thanks!

@adamgrzybowski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mountiny I'm currently working on this. BTW I'll have to create some automated tests and probably tests for other PR for react-navigation that ended in the reviewers limbo. I will keep you updated

@mountiny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks!

@adamgrzybowski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I created a PR in the react-navigation repo react-navigation/react-navigation#12553. I guess we can merge this one now

cc: @mountiny

@shubham1206agra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@adamgrzybowski Can you merge main here?

@shubham1206agra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-04-16.at.9.48.49.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-04-16.at.9.05.49.PM.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-04-16.at.9.27.38.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-04-16.at.8.59.06.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-04-16.at.8.54.08.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-04-16.at.9.11.28.PM.mov

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from mountiny April 16, 2025 16:22
@adamgrzybowski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@adamgrzybowski Can you merge main here?

done

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for patience and creating the upstream fix

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 999088b into Expensify:main Apr 17, 2025
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@adamgrzybowski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mountiny Thanks for the upstream fix policy 😄 It's great to share our findings with the community

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.30-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.1.30-4 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants