-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
Fix - Calculate missing comment for category on the client #62124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
MarioExpensify
merged 9 commits into
Expensify:main
from
FitseTLT:fix-add-missing-comment-violation-onyx-data
May 29, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f587cfd
added missing violation onyx data
FitseTLT 5790fa8
Merge branch 'main' into fix-add-missing-comment-violation-onyx-data
FitseTLT 0d7303d
added test
FitseTLT df919cf
Merge branch 'main' into fix-add-missing-comment-violation-onyx-data
FitseTLT b32d073
Merge branch 'main' into fix-add-missing-comment-violation-onyx-data
FitseTLT 2517f12
calculate violation data on receipt change
FitseTLT 0f6182d
Merge branch 'main' into fix-add-missing-comment-violation-onyx-data
FitseTLT cc85c2a
Merge branch 'main' into fix-add-missing-comment-violation-onyx-data
FitseTLT deef8db
reset transaction receipt on detach receipt
FitseTLT File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@FitseTLT Same thing happened here with
it.only()😁There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I'm missing the context here, what happened @tgolen?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are merging the fix don't worry 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MarioExpensify sorry, the context comes from another PR were
it.only()was accidentally used also. Basically, when you useit.only(), then Jest will ONLY run that one test. It's great for debugging and developing locally, but it's also quite hazardous if it gets merged because it skips all the other tests in this file.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!! I wasn't aware of that, will keep an eye for other usages that may show up!