Skip to content

fix: Persist troubleshooting flags across login sessions#63650

Merged
cristipaval merged 9 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:use-staging-server-persistence
Jun 30, 2025
Merged

fix: Persist troubleshooting flags across login sessions#63650
cristipaval merged 9 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:use-staging-server-persistence

Conversation

@martasudol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$#62496

Tests

1. Launch iOS app and sign in.
2. Navigate to "Settings" - "Troubleshoot".
3. Toggle the "Use Staging Server" on (enable using staging server)
4. Sign out of the app and sign in with the same account
5. Navigate to "Settings" - "Troubleshoot" and check the "Use Staging Server" toggle - the option should be persisted to ON (Enabled).
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests.

QA Steps

Same as Tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
native_android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_web.mov
iOS: Native
native_ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_web.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@martasudol martasudol marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2025 13:06
@martasudol martasudol requested a review from a team as a code owner June 6, 2025 13:06
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from brunovjk and removed request for a team June 6, 2025 13:06
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@brunovjk Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Jun 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There's something weird going on @martasudol, and I haven't identified the cause yet, but almost no toggles on Troubleshhot tag are persisting, both in main and in our PR:

Screen.Recording.2025-06-06.at.13.15.15.mov

It's strange that it seems to me that in your tests everything went well, correct? I wonder what is 'clearing' those state. Thanks.

@martasudol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@brunovjk yeah, I can see that. I see that these flags are not stored keysToPreserve list. Let me fix it

@martasudol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@brunovjk that's how it works for me with updated changes. Could you test it on your side?

Nagranie.z.ekranu.2025-06-11.o.09.46.34.mov

@martasudol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@brunovjk ping 🙇

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry for the delay, I got caught up with other issues.
@martasudol, things are better now — the toggles are saving correctly. However, I can reproduce another bug. It's not 100%, but around 80% of the time, when I select everything in Troubleshoot, then log out and back in, I get stuck on the email entry screen during login.

We briefly see a flicker, moving to the next step (entering the verification code and logging in), but it quickly returns to the "enter your email" screen.

Screen.Recording.2025-06-15.at.16.26.48.mov

Can you reproduce this? Thanks.

@martasudol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@brunovjk can you reproduce it on staging? I found that it briefly shows the error: You need a magic code to sign in, but you've reached the maximum number of magic codes that can be sent. Please wait a few minutes and try again.. It shows the same error on staging for me.

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@brunovjk can you reproduce it on staging? I found that it briefly shows the error: You need a magic code to sign in, but you've reached the maximum number of magic codes that can be sent. Please wait a few minutes and try again.. It shows the same error on staging for me.

No, just in our PR. I'll do more tests today.

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@martasudol I can still reproduce the bug, but only in our PR. Strange, I'll investigate further in a moment. Thanks.

Screen.Recording.2025-06-16.at.17.04.12.mov

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I couldn't find the cause of the bug, any luck @martasudol? Thanks.

@martasudol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@brunovjk could you test with updated changes? 🙏

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sure :D thank you

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
63650_android_native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
63650_android_web.mov
iOS: HybridApp
63650_ios_native.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
63650_ios_web.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
63650_web_chrome.mov
MacOS: Desktop
63650_web_desktop.mov

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It's better now, but I still need to confirm one detail, I sent you a message on Slack @martasudol. Thanks.

@brunovjk brunovjk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. We fixed the issue, however if we:

  1. Toggle "Use Staging Server" on a device, for example native iOS
  2. Log out and then log in to another device, for example desktop, with the same account
  3. The "Use Staging Server" toggle is off.

Can we confirm that this is expected? Thank you.

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #62496 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from cristipaval June 26, 2025 14:10
@cristipaval cristipaval changed the title fix: use staging server persistence fix: Persist troubleshooting flags across login sessions Jun 30, 2025
@cristipaval cristipaval merged commit f99dbdc into Expensify:main Jun 30, 2025
20 checks passed
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.1.73-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@puneetlath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Our QA team tested on staging and this doesn't seem to have solve the issue.

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Jul 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Our QA team tested on staging and this doesn't seem to have solve the issue.

😔 shall we revert this PR then? Then we'll work on another one next.

cc: @martasudol

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.1.73-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@cristipaval

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@brunovjk , revert PR here

@martasudol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@brunovjk have you tested it? It works for me on staging 🤔

Nagranie.z.ekranu.2025-07-2.o.08.32.32.mov

@martasudol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@brunovjk bump

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants