Skip to content

Jakubkalinski0/fix console errors related to forward ref batch4#68843

Merged
mountiny merged 24 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:jakubkalinski0/Fix-console-errors-related-to-forwardRef-batch4
Aug 25, 2025
Merged

Jakubkalinski0/fix console errors related to forward ref batch4#68843
mountiny merged 24 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:jakubkalinski0/Fix-console-errors-related-to-forwardRef-batch4

Conversation

@jakubkalinski0

@jakubkalinski0 jakubkalinski0 commented Aug 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

The whole issue comes from forwardRef being deprecated in the near future of react thus we will no longer be able to access the passed ref by element.ref as forwardRef is needed for passing ref as a separate attribute. Now in order to pass there reference it has to be passed as one of the props so we can access it directly or like that -> element.props.ref.

In order to adjust the codebase to new react recommendations in every file that was using forwardRef the ref had to be moved to the props instead of being a separate attribute and forwardRef had to be completely removed.

Some files had to be changed due to the changes made in other components. In response to the number of files that needed adjusting the changes are made in batches with this one being the fourth one.

In this batch I mostly took care of Create Manual Expense flow. At first it was part of one PR which was supposed to cover whole create expense flow but it grew too big. This batch touches plenty of components responsible for handling input from user.

Manual money request ->

image
  1. src/pages/iou/MoneyRequestAmountForm.tsx
image
  1. src/components/MoneyRequestAmountInput.tsx
image
  1. src/components/NumberWithSymbolForm.tsx
image
  1. src/components/TextInputWithSymbol/BaseTextInputWithSymbol.tsx
  2. src/components/TextInputWithSymbol/index.android.tsx
  3. src/components/TextInputWithSymbol/index.tsx
  4. src/components/TextInputWithSymbol/index.web.tsx
  5. src/components/TextInputWithSymbol/types.ts
image
  1. src/components/AmountTextInput.tsx
image
  1. src/components/TextInput/BaseTextInput/implementation/index.native.tsx
  2. src/components/TextInput/BaseTextInput/implementation/index.tsx
  3. src/components/TextInput/BaseTextInput/index.e2e.tsx
  4. src/components/TextInput/BaseTextInput/types.ts
  5. src/components/TextInput/index.native.tsx
  6. src/components/TextInput/index.tsx
image
  1. src/components/RNTextInput.tsx
  2. src/components/RNMarkdownTextInput.tsx
  3. src/components/RNMaskedTextInput.tsx

Those required change in order for certain inputs using them to work without forwardRef ->

  1. src/components/AmountForm.tsx
  2. src/components/Form/FormProvider.tsx

These here had to be changed in response to the changes made in other files. They required only cosmetic changes which cannot produce any issues and thus they require no testing ->

  1. src/components/AmountPicker/AmountSelectorModal.tsx
  2. src/components/Composer/implementation/index.native.tsx
  3. src/components/PercentageForm.tsx
  4. src/components/SubStepForms/AddressStep.tsx
  5. src/components/TextPicker/types.ts
  6. src/components/TextInput/BaseTextInput/implementations.ts
  7. src/pages/PrivateNotes/PrivateNotesEditPage.tsx
  8. src/pages/iou/request/step/IOURequestStepAmount.tsx
  9. src/pages/iou/request/step/IOURequestStepTaxAmountPage.tsx
  10. src/pages/settings/Profile/CustomStatus/StatusPage.tsx
  11. src/pages/settings/Security/MergeAccounts/AccountDetailsPage.tsx
  12. src/pages/settings/Wallet/InternationalDepositAccount/substeps/AccountType.tsx
  13. src/pages/workspace/reports/CreateReportFieldsPage.tsx

Fixed Issues

$ #67033
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. When you have your app on, open DevTools console
  2. Throughout this whole flow look out in console for any new errors while inputing the amount or while writing in 1:1 chat
  3. Click on the floating "+" button in the navigation bar on the left or in the 1:1 chat.
  4. Press "Create Expense"
  5. When the sidePanel on the right opens choose "Manual"
  6. Change the currency
  7. Input the amount
  8. Verify that the input works
  9. Press "Next" button
  10. Press "Create X amount expense" button
  11. Go to 1:1 chat
  12. Input any message
  13. Verify that input works
  14. Send message
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

SAME AS TESTS ^

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

SAME AS TESTS ^

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
2.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@jakubkalinski0 jakubkalinski0 force-pushed the jakubkalinski0/Fix-console-errors-related-to-forwardRef-batch4 branch from cb3d4cf to 43a7411 Compare August 20, 2025 10:16

@SzymczakJ SzymczakJ left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, left one small comment

Comment thread src/components/PercentageForm.tsx
@jakubkalinski0 jakubkalinski0 marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2025 15:57
@jakubkalinski0 jakubkalinski0 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 20, 2025 15:57
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from allroundexperts August 20, 2025 15:57
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@allroundexperts Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team August 20, 2025 15:57
@allroundexperts

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

Unable to build android

Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-08-25.at.8.51.40.AM.mov
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2025-08-25.at.8.50.27.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-08-25.at.8.49.18.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-08-25.at.8.40.05.AM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-08-25.at.8.44.54.AM.mov

@allroundexperts allroundexperts left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works good!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from mountiny August 25, 2025 03:57

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! One NAB comment, moving this ahead

forwardedRef(ref);
} else if (forwardedRef && 'current' in forwardedRef) {
// eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign
// eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign, react-compiler/react-compiler

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How to do this to follow the rules of React so we do not have to skip the compiler? We will start enforcing it soon so I think ideally this is fixed as well so we do not skip react compiler

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will look if it can be done

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mountiny FYI it appears those actually had to be introduced because of the improper handling of refs that caused issues with the autoFocus (which should have been the first sign of something not being right here 😅). So after the autoFocus fix is merged we will no longer be skipping the compiler here 🚀

@mountiny mountiny merged commit cf9d8d5 into Expensify:main Aug 25, 2025
26 of 36 checks passed
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.99-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.1.99-11 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants