Unreported Expense - Category field#73101
Conversation
This reverts commit aecce9d.
…ack-internal/Expensify-App into feat/71784-category-field-reapply
|
@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
|
@koko57 Can you please add a list of issues that you have fixed other that the main one? |
|
@parasharrajat done! |
|
Thanks. I will test now. |
| const fetchData = useCallback(() => { | ||
| const policyIDToFetchCategories = report?.policyID === CONST.POLICY.ID_FAKE ? activePolicyID : report?.policyID; | ||
| getPolicyCategories(policyIDToFetchCategories ?? CONST.POLICY.ID_FAKE); | ||
| }, [activePolicyID, report?.policyID]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now this API will be called each time regardless we have data or not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe it's intended and the only fix? cc @MrMuzyk
Why do you think it would cause problems?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is an unnecessary api call to the backend when we have data. Can we skip the call when policy categories are present?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok I will check this one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@parasharrajat fixed - I restored the previous logic but changed report?.policyID to policyID, so now it should fetch the data properly
|
this is because there's no data about the workspace categories in Onyx. I have a draft PR in the backend to address this issue. Let's not block the PR on this, because this is a very rare case |
|
@cristipaval thanks! I was about to write about it but you were faster 😅 |
|
Testing... |
|
@koko57 Can you please fix linting issues? |
|
@parasharrajat all checks passed |
Screenshots🔲 iOS / native23.10.2025_02.01.48_REC.mp416.10.2025_20.32.59_REC.mp4🔲 MacOS / Chrome23.10.2025_01.38.43_REC.mp423.10.2025_01.40.07_REC.mp423.10.2025_01.45.46_REC.mp416.10.2025_19.05.30_REC.mp4🔲 Android / Chrome16.10.2025_20.41.23_REC.mp416.10.2025_20.43.15_REC.mp4🔲 Android / native16.10.2025_19.07.23_REC.mp4 |
|
BUG: Category page shows infinite loader when user has only once invited workspace. Steps:
you can try these steps after removing cache as well. 23.10.2025_01.41.50_REC.1.mp4error from backend on
|
parasharrajat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added
Designlabel so the design team can review the changes.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
|
This bug #73101 (comment) will be solved in #72822 as it is backend issue. |
|
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.2.37-1 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.2.37-8 🚀
|



Explanation of Change
Reapplies previously reverted PR that adds category field on unreported expenses
Fixed Issues
$ #71784
$ #72836
$ #72864
$ #72820
$ #72821
PROPOSAL:
Tests
Same as QA steps
Offline tests
QA Steps
Prerequisites: Account has selfDM
Scenario A:
Precondition: User with a default workspace or only one non-default workspace
Scenario B:
Precondition: User with a several (2 or more) non-default workspaces
Create a new tracked expense
Scenario C:
Precondition: User has no workspace
Scenario D: (#72836)
Preconditions:
Have at least 2 workspaces.
The account has no default workspace.
Scenario E (#72864):
Precondition: Account has self DM and a workspace.
Scenario F (#72822):
Precondition: Account only has a non-default workspace.
Scenario G (#72820):
Precondition: Account has self DM and a workspace.
Scenario H (#72821):
Preconditions:
User is invited to the workspace.
User does not have other workspace.
The invited workspace has disabled Categories.
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectioncanBeMissingparam foruseOnyxtoggleReportand notonIconClick)src/languages/*files and using the translation methodSTYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))npm run compress-svg)Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-10-14.at.12.50.50.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-10-14.at.12.27.18.mp4
Screen.Recording.2025-10-14.at.12.26.47.mp4
MacOS: Desktop