[CP Staging] fix search option unclickable by Nodebrute · Pull Request #77972 · Expensify/App

Nodebrute · 2025-12-18T11:18:35Z

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

Tests

Bug 1:
Go to self DM.
Create an expense.
Open the expense thread.
Click search icon.
Click Search in.
Verify search in option is clickable and in recent chat there is no empty thread

Bug 2
Go to workspace chat.
Create two expenses.
Open expense report.
Open any expense.
Send a message in the expense thread.
Open the expense thread with message from LHN.
Click search icon.
Click Search in.
Verify search in option is clickable

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."
Bug 1:
Go to self DM.
Create an expense.
Open the expense thread.
Click search icon.
Click Search in.
Verify search in option is clickable and in recent chat there is no empty thread

Bug 2
Go to workspace chat.
Create two expenses.
Open expense report.
Open any expense.
Send a message in the expense thread.
Open the expense thread with message from LHN.
Click search icon.
Click Search in.
Verify search in option is clickable

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2025-12-18.at.4.28.36.PM.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2025-12-18.at.4.32.01.PM.mov

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2025-12-18.at.4.20.44.PM.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2025-12-18.at.4.24.15.PM.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2025-12-18.at.4.13.33.PM.mov

melvin-bot · 2025-12-18T11:18:41Z

@rojiphil Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Nodebrute · 2025-12-18T11:19:31Z

Will attach the remaining videos shortly.

codecov · 2025-12-18T11:27:07Z

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/libs/OptionsListUtils/index.ts	`73.11% <100.00%> (ø)`
... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

rojiphil · 2025-12-18T11:46:07Z

Reviewing now

rojiphil · 2025-12-18T12:01:54Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: HybridApp
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: HybridApp
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

99792-android-hybrid-001.mp4

Android: mWeb Chrome

99762-mweb-chrome-001.mp4

iOS: HybridApp

99792-ios-hybrid-001.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

99762-mweb-safari-001.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

99792-web-chrome-001.mp4

rojiphil

Thanks @Nodebrute for the PR.

@Gonals Changes LGTM and works well too.
Over to you. Thanks.

[CP Staging] fix search option unclickable (cherry picked from commit b27bc4d) (cherry-picked to staging by mountiny)

OSBotify · 2025-12-18T14:03:28Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify · 2025-12-18T14:34:30Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.81-5 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2025-12-18T18:49:49Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.2.81-5 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2025-12-18T19:04:18Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.82-0 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2025-12-18T19:33:39Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.82-0 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2025-12-18T20:12:19Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.81-5 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2025-12-18T21:13:12Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.2.81-5 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2025-12-18T21:48:33Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.82-0 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2025-12-19T13:20:42Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.84-0 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2025-12-19T23:41:38Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.2.84-8 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

fix search option unclickable

752e517

Nodebrute requested review from a team as code owners December 18, 2025 11:18

melvin-bot Bot assigned Nodebrute Dec 18, 2025

melvin-bot Bot requested a review from rojiphil December 18, 2025 11:18

melvin-bot Bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and removed request for a team December 18, 2025 11:18

Gonals changed the title ~~fix search option unclickable~~ [CP Staging] fix search option unclickable Dec 18, 2025

Nodebrute mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2025

[$250] Expense - "Search in" is missing report name and is not clickable #77844

Closed

7 tasks

Gonals requested a review from DylanDylann December 18, 2025 11:41

add policies

acccd5d

Gonals removed the request for review from DylanDylann December 18, 2025 11:49

rojiphil approved these changes Dec 18, 2025

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot Bot requested a review from Gonals December 18, 2025 13:08

Gonals approved these changes Dec 18, 2025

View reviewed changes

Gonals merged commit b27bc4d into Expensify:main Dec 18, 2025
32 of 33 checks passed

OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2025

Merge pull request #77972 from Nodebrute/searchin

b4989d2

[CP Staging] fix search option unclickable (cherry picked from commit b27bc4d) (cherry-picked to staging by mountiny)

OSBotify added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Dec 18, 2025

github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2025

Investigate workflow job failing on main: prettier / Prettier check #77985

Closed

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2025

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2025-12-16 #77818

Closed

Conversation

Nodebrute commented Dec 18, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

melvin-bot Bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

Nodebrute commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Dec 18, 2025 • edited by github-actions Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

rojiphil commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

rojiphil commented Dec 18, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

rojiphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 19, 2025

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Dec 19, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Nodebrute commented Dec 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Dec 18, 2025 •

edited by github-actions Bot

Loading

rojiphil commented Dec 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading