Skip to content

[Home Page] Create AnnouncementsSection Component #80931

Merged
mountiny merged 6 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:home-page/announcements-section
Jan 29, 2026
Merged

[Home Page] Create AnnouncementsSection Component #80931
mountiny merged 6 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:home-page/announcements-section

Conversation

@WojtekBoman

@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman commented Jan 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

  • Added CONST.HOME.ANNOUNCEMENTS with 3 dummy items (title, subtitle, url, publishedDate).
  • AnnouncementSection now displays each announcement via MenuItemWithTopDescription (subtitle on top, title below) and opens the URL on press.
  • Added DateIcon component in src/components/DateIcon.tsx: small square showing month abbreviation and day number; accepts a date string prop.
  • Extended MenuItem with a leftComponent prop; AnnouncementSection uses it to show the DateIcon on the left of each item.

Fixed Issues

$ #79981
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
    Precondition: access to newDotHome beta
  1. Announcements section – Verify if there are three items with date square, subtitle/title, and tap opens the right URL.

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

Comment thread src/components/DateIcon.tsx Outdated
Comment on lines +24 to +26
{
width: variables.iconSizeExtraLarge,
height: variables.iconSizeExtraLarge,

@ZhenjaHorbach ZhenjaHorbach Jan 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's move this into styles folder

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts 87.39% <ø> (ø)
src/components/MenuItem.tsx 87.80% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
src/styles/index.ts 42.47% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/home/ForYouSection/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/WidgetContainer.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/home/ForYouSection/EmptyState.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/home/DiscoverSection.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/home/HomePage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/DateIcon.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/home/AnnouncementSection.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

@mountiny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman changed the title Home page/announcements section [Home Page] Create AnnouncementsSection Component Jan 29, 2026
@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2026 19:46
@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman requested review from a team as code owners January 29, 2026 19:46
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ZhenjaHorbach Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed request for a team January 29, 2026 19:46
@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jan 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think we need to add some bottom padding so that the buttons don't overlap the content

Снимок экрана 2026-01-29 в 20 46 55

But it's a common issue for all screens
Снимок экрана 2026-01-29 в 20 52 17

@mountiny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Discussed with @dannymcclain that we will do nothing about the overlap now

@grgia

grgia commented Jan 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Added overlap to #80873 for tracking

grgia
grgia previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2026
@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jan 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
2026-01-29.20.42.07.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
2026-01-29.20.45.16.mov
iOS: HybridApp
2026-01-29.20.42.07.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
2026-01-29.20.45.16.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
2026-01-29.20.37.18.mov
2026-01-29.21.49.10.mov

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @grgia has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

mountiny
mountiny previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2026
@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Okay
Final result looks good!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from grgia January 29, 2026 20:56
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dubielzyk-expensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Expensify/design I think we might wanna tweak the padding on the right here to adjust for the chevrons whitespace?
CleanShot 2026-01-29 at 13 28 08@2x

@dubielzyk-expensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The test drive card disappears when it's fully loaded:

CleanShot.2026-01-29.at.13.28.50.mp4

@grgia

grgia commented Jan 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The test drive card disappears when it's fully loaded:

@mountiny
@WojtekBoman hmmm we need to change that check to wait until the user has watched the vid. What about we disable that check that hides it for now?

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The test drive card disappears when it's fully loaded:

CleanShot.2026-01-29.at.13.28.50.mp4

Actually weird that we don't have For you section on the video😅

@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman force-pushed the home-page/announcements-section branch from 7ca1361 to 4710b8e Compare January 29, 2026 22:32
@dannymcclain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dubielzyk-expensify Shouldn't all those chevrons be using the mini caret icon and be at 50% opacity?

@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman force-pushed the home-page/announcements-section branch from 4710b8e to c24daea Compare January 29, 2026 22:38
@dubielzyk-expensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dubielzyk-expensify Shouldn't all those chevrons be using the mini caret icon and be at 50% opacity?

Greeeat shout! But also, that PR isn't merged yet right? So we won't have access until then?

@dannymcclain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OH! I didn't realize that haha. My bad! :oh-nothing:

@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman force-pushed the home-page/announcements-section branch from c24daea to 1d60fa0 Compare January 29, 2026 22:41

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The padding changes requested from @dubielzyk-expensify are a bit complex with the hover logic et all so we are going to add them in the next pr with the beta removal

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 18f971d into Expensify:main Jan 29, 2026
29 checks passed
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@shawnborton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think we might wanna tweak the padding on the right here to adjust for the chevrons whitespace?

Agree with that and with Danny's comment about size. See ya in the follow ups I suppose!

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.11-16 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.3.12-1 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants