Skip to content

[Domain Control] [Release 4] Add Preferred Workspace to DomainGroupDetailsPage#88703

Merged
mountiny merged 30 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:war-in/domains/group-preferred-workspace
May 5, 2026
Merged

[Domain Control] [Release 4] Add Preferred Workspace to DomainGroupDetailsPage#88703
mountiny merged 30 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:war-in/domains/group-preferred-workspace

Conversation

@jakubstec

@jakubstec jakubstec commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Add Preferred Workspace setting for Domain Security Group RHP.

Fixed Issues

$ #80134
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Preconditions:

  • User is a domain admin
  • User has at least one security group in his domain
  • User belongs to at least one workspace
  1. Navigate to /domains/<domainAccountID>/groups
  2. Open any security group
  3. Set Preferred Workspace to true
  4. Select any workspace
  5. Verify that it has been correctly changed and visible in security group list
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as Tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

iOS: Native
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-04-24.at.13.37.46.mov
Screen.Recording.2026-04-24.at.13.38.30.mov

war-in and others added 23 commits March 9, 2026 18:21
…/domains/group-preferred-workspace

# Conflicts:
#	src/pages/domain/Groups/DomainGroupDetailsPage.tsx
…/domains/group-preferred-workspace

# Conflicts:
#	src/languages/en.ts
…/domains/group-preferred-workspace

# Conflicts:
#	src/pages/domain/Groups/DomainGroupDetailsPage.tsx
#	src/selectors/Policy.ts
…/domains/group-preferred-workspace

# Conflicts:
#	src/pages/domain/Groups/DomainGroupDetailsPage.tsx
#	src/selectors/Policy.ts
#	src/types/onyx/DomainErrors.ts
#	src/types/onyx/DomainPendingActions.ts
…om:software-mansion-labs/expensify-app-fork into war-in/domains/group-preferred-workspace,

replace HTMLMessageRow with generic ErrorMessageRow in PreferredWorkspaceToggle
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/SCREENS.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...avigation/linkingConfig/RELATIONS/DOMAIN_TO_RHP.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/Navigation/linkingConfig/config.ts 76.92% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/actions/Domain.ts 57.02% <ø> (ø)
src/selectors/Policy.ts 74.48% <100.00%> (+3.22%) ⬆️
src/ROUTES.ts 17.28% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
...gation/AppNavigator/ModalStackNavigators/index.tsx 6.77% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
src/pages/domain/Groups/DomainGroupDetailsPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...omain/Groups/DomainGroupPreferredWorkspacePage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...c/pages/domain/Groups/PreferredWorkspaceToggle.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@jakubstec jakubstec marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2026 12:18
@jakubstec jakubstec requested review from a team as code owners April 24, 2026 12:18
@jakubstec

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and situchan and removed request for a team April 24, 2026 12:18
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@situchan Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 62d199d20e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +77 to +80
...(enabled &&
!preferredPolicyID &&
firstAdminPolicy?.id && {
restrictedPrimaryPolicyID: firstAdminPolicy?.id,

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Split multi-field toggle update to preserve rollback correctness

This toggle update sends both enableRestrictedPrimaryPolicy and restrictedPrimaryPolicyID in one updateDomainSecurityGroup() call, but the action tracks rollback by a single settingsName (enableRestrictedPrimaryPolicy). If the write is rejected, updateDomainSecurityGroup() only reverts that one field, so the optimistic restrictedPrimaryPolicyID can remain stale in Onyx and the UI shows a preferred workspace that was never persisted.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's fine because we send the default workspace here and it's shown by default anyway, so there will be no visible change

switchAccessibilityLabel={translate('domain.groups.preferredWorkspace')}
shouldPlaceSubtitleBelowSwitch
isActive={isEnabled}
disabled={!hasAdminPolicies}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep the toggle usable when restriction is already enabled

The switch is fully disabled whenever hasAdminPolicies is false, which blocks both enabling and disabling. In the case where this setting is already on and the admin later has no admin workspaces (e.g., role/workspace changes), the UI no longer allows turning the restriction off, leaving the group stuck in that state from this page.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! I'll add && !isEnabled to that condition

Comment on lines +79 to +81
if (!group) {
return;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose this condition should be at the top

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The default workspace is not selected when I open the preferred workspace for the first time
Plus, when I don't select any workspace or save with the current workspace
We make a request(although in this case, it doesn't make sense to make a request)

2026-04-27.13.48.57.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

For some reason
For some groups, I get a 401 error after enable/disable Preferred Workspace toggle

Снимок экрана 2026-04-27 в 13 54 35

@war-in

war-in commented Apr 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The default workspace is not selected when I open the preferred workspace for the first time
Plus, when I don't select any workspace or save with the current workspace
We make a request(although in this case, it doesn't make sense to make a request)

I verified the data in onyx and it looks like this happens when you don't have access to this workspace. Probably someone set the preferred workspace to something and now it's showing you the first one due to this condition

title={preferredPolicyName ?? firstAdminPolicy?.name}

I was able to reproduce this behaviour in OD too

@war-in

war-in commented Apr 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

For some reason
For some groups, I get a 401 error after enable/disable Preferred Workspace toggle

I think this one might be caused by the same reason

@situchan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There's conflict

…rkspace

# Conflicts:
#	src/languages/de.ts
#	src/languages/en.ts
#	src/languages/es.ts
#	src/languages/fr.ts
#	src/languages/it.ts
#	src/languages/ja.ts
#	src/languages/nl.ts
#	src/languages/pl.ts
#	src/languages/pt-BR.ts
#	src/languages/zh-hans.ts
#	src/pages/domain/Groups/DomainGroupDetailsPage.tsx
#	src/types/onyx/DomainErrors.ts
#	src/types/onyx/DomainPendingActions.ts
@war-in

war-in commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@situchan conflicts resolved

@jakubstec

jakubstec commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Regarding the behavior @ZhenjaHorbach found, it was concluded in this Slack discussion to move forward with the current PR. Since the bug also exists on Classic, we will address it in a follow-up PR. 😄

war-in and others added 4 commits May 4, 2026 16:56
…rkspace

# Conflicts:
#	src/languages/de.ts
#	src/languages/en.ts
#	src/languages/es.ts
#	src/languages/fr.ts
#	src/languages/it.ts
#	src/languages/ja.ts
#	src/languages/nl.ts
#	src/languages/pl.ts
#	src/languages/pt-BR.ts
#	src/languages/zh-hans.ts
#	src/libs/actions/Domain.ts
#	src/pages/domain/Groups/DomainGroupDetailsPage.tsx
#	src/types/onyx/DomainErrors.ts
import type SCREENS from '@src/SCREENS';

type WorkspaceListItem = {
policyID: string;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Docs

Comment thread src/selectors/Policy.ts

const policyNameSelector = (policy: OnyxEntry<Policy>) => policy?.name;

const createAdminPoliciesSelector =

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TMisiukiewicz i wonder how does this one do from performance perspective. We saw that when the selector is a bit more complex it was actually better to just select all policies and do the filtering later

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As always... It depends 😅 for small admin sets the selector path is fine, but on accounts with lots of admin policies the deepEqual overhead can outweigh what the selector saves. It narrows down the collection and structure of the object, so I'd say we don't have to pre-optimize without evidence that it's slowing things down

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 17bac0c into Expensify:main May 5, 2026
34 of 35 checks passed
@OSBotify

OSBotify commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.67-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented May 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.3.67-13 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants