Harmonic centrality docs#477
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR adds comprehensive documentation for the Harmonic Centrality graph algorithm, registers it in the algorithms index, and updates the project's ChangesHarmonic Centrality Documentation
🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@algorithms/harmonic-centrality.md`:
- Around line 26-28: The fenced code block containing the formula "H(u) = Σ(v ≠
u) 1 / d(u, v)" lacks a language identifier; update that triple-backtick block
to include an appropriate identifier (e.g., text or math) so the block is
properly rendered and linting passes while keeping the content of the H(u)
formula unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: ad2728c5-8b49-4a57-a54f-64f42642c6d8
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.wordlist.txtalgorithms/harmonic-centrality.mdalgorithms/index.md
| ``` | ||
| H(u) = Σ(v ≠ u) 1 / d(u, v) | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add language identifier to the fenced code block.
The fenced code block should specify a language identifier for proper rendering and to satisfy linting rules.
📝 Proposed fix
-```
+```text
H(u) = Σ(v ≠ u) 1 / d(u, v)
</details>
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
```suggestion
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)
[warning] 26-26: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@algorithms/harmonic-centrality.md` around lines 26 - 28, The fenced code
block containing the formula "H(u) = Σ(v ≠ u) 1 / d(u, v)" lacks a language
identifier; update that triple-backtick block to include an appropriate
identifier (e.g., text or math) so the block is properly rendered and linting
passes while keeping the content of the H(u) formula unchanged.
GomezGab
force-pushed
the
harmonic-centrality
branch
from
52af734 to
d10a018
Compare
Surfaced by a local dry-run against a historical commit pair: the script was calling ``pathlib.Path(path).read_text()`` to grab the content of added/modified files. That works in CI because ``actions/checkout`` puts HEAD on disk, but it fails locally when the working directory isn't at HEAD_SHA (e.g., running the script against a past commit to debug). Switched to ``git show <head>:<path>``, which pulls the blob from the object store regardless of what's checked out. Returns None on "not present at that commit" and the caller skips silently — same permissive behavior as the previous ``except FileNotFoundError: pass`` in the rename branch, now applied uniformly. Verified locally on commit pair 5f90004..3ce7b18 (PR #477 merge): script produces +1 ~1 -0 with correct file contents from the object store. CI behavior unchanged because the checked-out HEAD's blobs match the object-store blobs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit