Merged
Conversation
neill-b
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2026
Contributor
neill-b
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Apart from the size there appears to be no difference in the contents of the files.
Contributor
Author
|
any opinion about this? @BenjaminRuston |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This is a start to clean up/enhance the GNSS RO files in the test data.
This PR deflated a couple large than 1M files. Related tests passed.
size changes:
5M -> 2M gnssro_geoval_6prof_2022090100.nc4
1.5M -> 488 K gnssro_geoval_2018041500_3prof.nc4
Notes to self:
gnssro_obs_2018041500_3prof_avtemp.nc4
gnssro_geoval_2018041500_3prof_avtemp.nc4
Issue(s) addressed
Resolves #559
Dependencies
N/A
Impact
should be N/A
Manual Testing Instructions (optional)
ctest -R gnssro
Checklist