CI: PrAssignee: Don't add status label to prs automatically#58606
Merged
inkydragon merged 2 commits intomasterfrom Jun 3, 2025
Merged
CI: PrAssignee: Don't add status label to prs automatically#58606inkydragon merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
PrAssignee: Don't add status label to prs automatically#58606inkydragon merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
DilumAluthge
reviewed
Jun 2, 2025
Member
DilumAluthge
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we just comment out the relevant lines instead? And then in the future, it's easy for us to just uncomment those lines when we're ready to start using the label.
Member
Author
|
Good idea. |
DilumAluthge
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2025
DilumAluthge
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2025
PrAssignee: Don't add status label to prs automatically
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This status label will be helpful once it has a well defined semantic and we have more statuses to transition between. As is, it is mostly noise and I think it should be (temporarily) removed.