Update to changes in Base's cov and cor#141
Merged
andreasnoack merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Oct 11, 2015
Merged
Conversation
3e9739d to
9af633a
Compare
andreasnoack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2015
Update to changes in Base's cov and cor
Contributor
|
The new syntax should be added to Compat, this won't be the only use case. |
Member
Author
|
I wouldn't be so sure about that, but they are in progress anyway. I think few people uses a custom mean or MLE corrections when computing covariances. I tried to search through julia repositories on GitHub, but unfortunately the search doesn't allow |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These changes are necessary after JuliaLang/julia#13465 where the keyword arguments for
meanandvardimwere removed. Notice that the tests there won't pass before JuliaLang/julia#13505 has been merged. I got some of the deprecation definitions wrong in the first attempt.