ci(coverage): fix gcovr report generation

[ReenigneArcher]

Description

Fixes gcovr report generation.

Screenshot

Issues Fixed or Closed

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Dependency update (updates to dependencies)
• Documentation update (changes to documentation)
• Repository update (changes to repository files, e.g. .github/...)

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have added or updated the in code docstring/documentation-blocks for new or existing methods/components

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.31%. Comparing base (48ca85e) to head (3a76b4d).
Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #118      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.20%   94.31%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          32       34       +2     
  Lines        1932     1988      +56     
  Branches     1013     1029      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits         1820     1875      +55     
- Misses         49       51       +2     
+ Partials       63       62       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux	90.64% <ø> (ø)
Windows	94.14% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
macOS	74.57% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 9 files with indirect coverage changes

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud