fix: additional error handling, more logs, more retries#80
Conversation
![codereviewbot-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/309638?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| if (payload?.method === 'eth_call' && response.error?.message?.includes('execution reverted') || response.error?.code === -32000) { | ||
| return true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logical OR operator in the condition payload?.method === 'eth_call' && response.error?.message?.includes('execution reverted') || response.error?.code === -32000 is not grouped properly with parentheses, which could lead to unexpected behavior. The condition is meant to check if the method is 'eth_call' and the message includes 'execution reverted', or if the error code is -32000. However, without proper grouping, it might evaluate the 'eth_call' and 'execution reverted' check together with the error code check in an unintended way. To fix this, add parentheses around the conditions that should be evaluated together to ensure the correct order of operations.
| const isRateLimitError = (response, payload) => { | ||
| const { result, ...data } = response | ||
| const code = response.error?.code | ||
| if (code === 429 || code === -32029 || code === -32097) { | ||
| return true | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (payload?.method === 'eth_call' && (response.error?.message?.includes('execution reverted') || response.error?.code === -32000)) { | ||
| return true | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const message = response.error?.message?.toLowerCase() | ||
| if (!message) { | ||
| return false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function isRateLimitError is misleadingly named as it checks for more than just rate limit errors. It also checks for execution reversion and generic errors, which are not related to rate limiting. This can lead to confusion and incorrect error handling.
Recommended solution: Rename the function to accurately reflect the types of errors it checks for, or refactor the function to only check for rate limit errors and handle other error types separately.
2 participants
No description provided.