Context: The first R/ggplot2 implementation merged (PR #6951). The rendered plot title currently reads:
scatter-basic · ggplot2 · anyplot.ai
The library is shown but the language is not. For Python-only libraries this didn't matter ("matplotlib" implies Python), but now that we have R libraries (ggplot2 today, possibly more later), the title is ambiguous: viewers can't tell at a glance whether a chart is Python or R.
Decision needed: how should language be surfaced in the rendered image title? Options off the top:
- `scatter-basic · ggplot2 (R 4.4.1) · anyplot.ai`
- `scatter-basic · R · ggplot2 · anyplot.ai`
- `scatter-basic · ggplot2 [R] · anyplot.ai`
- Drop from image title entirely, surface only on the page/metadata
- Something else
Marking as discussion-only — design decision precedes implementation.
Touched code paths once decided:
- `prompts/plot-generator.md` — the title format is enforced by the generator prompt
- `prompts/library/ggplot2.md` (and per-library overrides if added)
- `prompts/quality-evaluator.md` — needs to know the new format so review doesn't flag it
- Possibly `scripts/style-experiment.py` if title format is hardcoded
Context: The first R/ggplot2 implementation merged (PR #6951). The rendered plot title currently reads:
The library is shown but the language is not. For Python-only libraries this didn't matter ("matplotlib" implies Python), but now that we have R libraries (ggplot2 today, possibly more later), the title is ambiguous: viewers can't tell at a glance whether a chart is Python or R.
Decision needed: how should language be surfaced in the rendered image title? Options off the top:
Marking as discussion-only — design decision precedes implementation.
Touched code paths once decided: