-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 279
Add nonce tracker to transactions controller #1147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5679f2b
add nonceTracker to TransactionsController
adonesky1 4abd631
cleanup
adonesky1 2138d65
address feedback
adonesky1 c73cf69
update comment
adonesky1 9f2662e
modify mocking strategy
adonesky1 96c406d
cleanup
adonesky1 c2961a4
address feedback
adonesky1 943b0b1
Merge branch 'main' into add-nonce-tracker-to-transactions-controller
adonesky1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this is now an exported type, doesn't it warrant constraining
BlockTrackerto something more specific thanany?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps! But I don't believe that's appropriately scoped to this PR. As you can see directly above this we are doing the same with
Provider:Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How does the type of
Providerreduce the scope of this PR?The impacts of the type being
anyis different for public and private interfaces. A type which is acceptable asanyinternally may require constraining before being appropriate for exposure.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On that point I was just noting that we're already exporting the
ProviderProxyobject with aProvidertype parameter that is also typed asany.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently the BlockTracker is set here, where it is a property on the
Provider. I believe there is an intention to follow back here and improve typing soon. cc @Gudahtt @mcmireIf we think it makes sense to add the types for both
ProviderandBlockTrackerin this PR I'm open to that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's right. We're using
anyat the moment becauseweb3-provider-enginedoesn't provide types at all, and we're about to replace it anyway (see #1116). Once the replacement is complete, then we can just use the correct types from@metamask/eth-json-rpc-providerandeth-block-tracker.