feat: add Robinhood Chain native asset id and multicall address - #9443
Merged
Conversation
maxime-oe
force-pushed
the
feat/add-robinhood-codefi-and-multicall
branch
from
July 9, 2026 10:15
83c38ab to
6aecbc3
Compare
maxime-oe
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 9, 2026 10:19
maxime-oe
force-pushed
the
feat/add-robinhood-codefi-and-multicall
branch
from
July 9, 2026 10:20
6aecbc3 to
76b930d
Compare
maxime-oe
enabled auto-merge
July 9, 2026 10:34
bergarces
reviewed
Jul 9, 2026
| '0x13b2': 'eip155:5042/erc20:0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000', // Arc - Native symbol: USDC | ||
| '0x1b58': 'eip155:7000/slip44:7000', // ZetaChain - Native symbol: ZETA | ||
| '0x2105': 'eip155:8453/slip44:60', // Base - Native symbol: ETH | ||
| '0x1237': 'eip155:4663/slip44:60', // Robinhood Chain - Native symbol: ETH |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tested, the chain is supported.
bergarces
approved these changes
Jul 9, 2026
salimtb
approved these changes
Jul 9, 2026
pull Bot
pushed a commit
to dmrazzy/core
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2026
## Explanation <!-- Thanks for your contribution! Take a moment to answer these questions so that reviewers have the information they need to properly understand your changes: * What is the current state of things and why does it need to change? * What is the solution your changes offer and how does it work? * Are there any changes whose purpose might not obvious to those unfamiliar with the domain? * If your primary goal was to update one package but you found you had to update another one along the way, why did you do so? * If you had to upgrade a dependency, why did you do so? --> ## [Asset Controller 10.2.0] ### Added - Add Robinhood Chain (`4663`/`0x1237`) in `MulticallClient` ([MetaMask#9443](MetaMask#9443)) ### Changed - `MulticallClient` memoizes `balanceOf` and `getEthBalance` call encodings per account address when building multicall batches, reducing redundant ABI encoding for wallets with many tokens ([MetaMask#9425](MetaMask#9425)) - Bump `@metamask/transaction-controller` from `^68.2.2` to `^68.3.0` ([MetaMask#9421](MetaMask#9421)) - Bump `@metamask/keyring-api` from `^23.3.0` to `^23.5.0` ([MetaMask#9390](MetaMask#9390)) - Bump `@metamask/keyring-snap-client` from `^9.0.2` to `^9.2.0` ([MetaMask#9390](MetaMask#9390)) - Bump `@metamask/account-tree-controller` from `^7.5.3` to `^7.5.4` ([MetaMask#9429](MetaMask#9429)) - Bump `@metamask/assets-controllers` from `^109.3.0` to `^109.3.1` ([MetaMask#9429](MetaMask#9429)) - Bump `@metamask/assets-controllers` from `^109.3.0` to `^109.4.0` ([MetaMask#9429](MetaMask#9429), [MetaMask#9450](MetaMask#9450)) ## [Assets-Controllers 109.4.0] ### Added - Add Robinhood Chain (`4663`/`0x1237`) entries in `multicall.ts` and `codefi-v2.ts` ([MetaMask#9443](MetaMask#9443)) ## References <!-- Are there any issues that this pull request is tied to? Are there other links that reviewers should consult to understand these changes better? Are there client or consumer pull requests to adopt any breaking changes? For example: * Fixes #12345 * Related to #67890 --> ## Checklist - [ ] I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate - [ ] I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or updated code as appropriate - [ ] I've communicated my changes to consumers by [updating changelogs for packages I've changed](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/tree/main/docs/processes/updating-changelogs.md) - [ ] I've introduced [breaking changes](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/tree/main/docs/processes/breaking-changes.md) in this PR and have prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer packages to resolve them <!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY --> --- > [!NOTE] > **Low Risk** > Version and changelog/lockfile coordination only; functional changes are additive chain support and multicall encoding optimizations described in prior PRs. > > **Overview** > Cuts **monorepo release `1109.0.0`** by bumping published package versions and aligning dependent packages and `yarn.lock`. > > **`@metamask/assets-controller` `10.2.0`** documents Robinhood Chain (`4663`/`0x1237`) support in `MulticallClient`, memoized `balanceOf` / `getEthBalance` encodings in multicall batches, and several dependency bumps (including `@metamask/assets-controllers` to `^109.4.0`). > > **`@metamask/assets-controllers` `109.4.0`** documents Robinhood Chain entries in `multicall.ts` and `codefi-v2.ts`. > > **`bridge-controller`** and **`transaction-pay-controller`** update their `package.json` dependencies to `@metamask/assets-controller` `^10.2.0` and `@metamask/assets-controllers` `^109.4.0`, with matching changelog notes. > > <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit c721375. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure [here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup> <!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY --> --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Explanation
Added
4663/0x1237) inMulticallClient(#9443)Added
4663/0x1237) entries inmulticall.tsandcodefi-v2.ts(#9443)References
Checklist
Note
Low Risk
Small, additive chain-ID mappings only; no auth, security, or behavioral logic changes beyond enabling Robinhood Chain for multicall balances and native pricing.
Overview
Adds Robinhood Chain (chain ID
4663, hex0x1237) to the same chain-registry pattern used for other EVM networks.In
@metamask/assets-controller,MulticallClientmaps0x1237to the standard Multicall3 deploy (0xcA11…CA11) so RPC balance batching can run on that chain instead of treating it as unsupported.In
@metamask/assets-controllers, the sharedmulticall.tstable gets the same Multicall3 entry, andcodefi-v2.tsmaps the chain’s native asset toeip155:4663/slip44:60(ETH). Unreleased changelog notes document both package changes.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 76b930d. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.