forked from simpeg/simpeg
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
example cleanup, fixing access to properties #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
domfournier
merged 1 commit into
MiraGeoscience:refactor/regularization
from
thibaut-kobold:ta/refactor_regularization
Jul 28, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we do some checks on what the input is? Hence using the setter that does the copy as well?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could, what do you have in mind?
Some thoughts / insights:
Admittedly, this option is not often use. Its main goal is to be able to restart a PGI where the GMM is being learnt (thus the difference between the reference GMM and the GMM model). gmmref is really the most important here.
The reason I do the deepcopy is that (remembering things from several years ago) I was having issues when pointing to the original object, so it was best to have only internal to the regularization (plus, it is potentially getting modified every iteration, something that the GMM class was not originally designed for, thus the creation of a new object that overwrite the previous).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep for sure. I just think we should check for at least the type and shape of the input to make sure the code can fail fast with a nice message if the input doesn't make sense. We should probably do some typing of the return value as well. I don't even know myself what the input/output looks like.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
gmmis an object of class "WeightedGaussianMixture" (or one of its children class). We would need to have avalidatemethod somewhere then.We can think of something. This is a very quick first pass. I just checked that tests and examples were running. Up to you if you want me to have all in a single PR or if you want to merge this one and I create others as I go.