Skip to content

docs: add rating system spec - #28

Merged
grunch merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/rating-spec
Mar 24, 2026
Merged

docs: add rating system spec#28
grunch merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/rating-spec

Conversation

@mostronatorcoder

@mostronatorcoder mostronatorcoder Bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds RATING_SYSTEM.md and cross-document links for the post-trade rating flow (section 9).

Covers:

  • /rate_user/:orderId route & RateCounterpartScreen
  • RatingUser payload, validation (1-5 scale)
  • Rating model for order-book reputation display
  • Action.rate, Action.rateUser, Action.rateReceived
  • Star-rendering logic in order-book items
  • Filter provider for rating range

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added detailed specification for the post-trade rating system, enabling users to rate counterparties using a 1-5 star scale.
    • Updated navigation routes, system documentation, and cross-references to reflect the rating system flow and integration with order book reputation display.

@grunch

grunch commented Mar 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@grunch
grunch merged commit 816381c into main Mar 24, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7bdd27ad-d639-4644-9e6b-2bc3fea4f161

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a0efd35 and 0e68568.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .specify/v1-reference/NAVIGATION_ROUTES.md
  • .specify/v1-reference/RATING_SYSTEM.md
  • .specify/v1-reference/README.md
  • .specify/v1-reference/TRADE_EXECUTION.md

Walkthrough

This pull request adds comprehensive specification documentation for a post-trade rating system in the Mostro Mobile v1 application. It introduces a new navigation route (/rate_user/:orderId), defines detailed UX flows and payload structures, specifies action messaging via NIP-59 gift wrapping, and documents rating display logic in the order book. All changes are documentation-only, with no modifications to executable code.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Rating System Specification
RATING_SYSTEM.md
New comprehensive specification file (196 lines) documenting the rating UX flow, RatingUser payload constraints, Rating structure and parsing, action-to-status mapping, button availability rules, order book display logic, and edge-case/error handling behaviors.
Documentation Index and Navigation Updates
.specify/v1-reference/README.md, .specify/v1-reference/NAVIGATION_ROUTES.md, .specify/v1-reference/TRADE_EXECUTION.md
Updated document index to include RATING_SYSTEM.md; added navigation route entry for /rate_user/:orderId mapped to RateCounterpartScreen; added cross-reference linking trade execution's Rate button to the new rating system spec. Note: possible route duplication in NAVIGATION_ROUTES.md detected.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 With whiskers twitching, stars align,
A rating system—documentation divine!
Trust flows through each spec'd decree,
From trades to trust, hopping free! ⭐✨

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/rating-spec

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@grunch
grunch deleted the docs/rating-spec branch March 24, 2026 21:37
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant