[None][chore] Fix format issue in tensorrt_llm/serve/openai_server.py

[chienchunhung]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Style
  • Code formatting adjustments for improved readability.

Description

Fix a formatting issue complained by pre-commit hook.

Test Coverage

PR Checklist

Please review the following before submitting your PR:

• PR description clearly explains what and why. If using CodeRabbit's summary, please make sure it makes sense.

• PR Follows TRT-LLM CODING GUIDELINES to the best of your knowledge.

• Test cases are provided for new code paths (see test instructions)

• Any new dependencies have been scanned for license and vulnerabilities

• CODEOWNERS updated if ownership changes

• Documentation updated as needed

• Update tava architecture diagram if there is a significant design change in PR.

• The reviewers assigned automatically/manually are appropriate for the PR.

• Please check this after reviewing the above items as appropriate for this PR.

GitHub Bot Help

To see a list of available CI bot commands, please comment /bot help.

[pcastonguay]

/bot skip --comment "fixing pre-commit"

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f24c36ae-fa81-432a-aca5-e0d2d15d8b29

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b81307 and 32b8082.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tensorrt_llm/serve/openai_server.py

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Code formatting refactoring that reflowed two identical output_path assignments by introducing line breaks after the path operator, maintaining semantic equivalence with no changes to control flow or error handling.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Formatting Refactor tensorrt_llm/serve/openai_server.py	Reflowed two output_path assignments across lines by adding line breaks after path operator; no functional changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the main change: fixing a formatting issue in a specific file as indicated by the raw summary.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description provides a brief explanation of the issue (formatting complaint from pre-commit hook) but lacks specific test coverage information despite the template section being present.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[tensorrt-cicd]

PR_Github #37754 [ skip ] triggered by Bot. Commit: 32b8082 Link to invocation

[tensorrt-cicd]

PR_Github #37754 [ skip ] completed with state SUCCESS. Commit: 32b8082
Skipping testing for commit 32b8082

Link to invocation