Skip to content

[None][test] Waive 1 failed cases for main in QA CI - #15699

Closed
tensorrt-cicd wants to merge 2 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
tensorrt-cicd:trtllm-ci-report/waive-20260629-024659
Closed

[None][test] Waive 1 failed cases for main in QA CI#15699
tensorrt-cicd wants to merge 2 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
tensorrt-cicd:trtllm-ci-report/waive-20260629-024659

Conversation

@tensorrt-cicd

@tensorrt-cicd tensorrt-cicd commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Auto-generated Waive PR

Created by: TensorRT LLM CI Report (requested by qa@nvidia.com)
Target branch: main
Jenkins build: https://prod.blsm.nvidia.com/swqa-tensorrt-qa-test/job/LLM_FUNCTION_TEST/2305/
Bug(s): 6388239

Waive entries added

full:RTX_PRO_6000_Blackwell_Server_Edition/accuracy/test_disaggregated_serving.py::TestDeepSeekV3Lite::test_auto_dtype[mtp_nextn=0-overlap_scheduler=False] SKIP (https://nvbugs/6388239)

This PR was auto-generated by TensorRT LLM CI Report. Please review the waive entries before merging.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a test waiver for one integration test in a specific environment to prevent a known validation issue from blocking runs.

Bug(s): 6388239
Requested by: qa@nvidia.com
Jenkins build: https://prod.blsm.nvidia.com/swqa-tensorrt-qa-test/job/LLM_FUNCTION_TEST/2305/

Signed-off-by: tensorrt-cicd <90828364+tensorrt-cicd@users.noreply.github.com>
@xinhe-nv
xinhe-nv marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2026 03:09
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: d6bd116f-d840-49f5-8d64-e7f727fcf31f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 20e0e91 and 5bc4fff.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds one SKIP waiver entry in tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt for the full:RTX_PRO_6000_Blackwell_Server_Edition environment, waiving accuracy/test_disaggregated_serving.py::TestDeepSeekV3Lite::test_auto_dtype[mtp_nextn=0-overlap_scheduler=False] with reference nvbugs/6388239.

Changes

Test Waiver

Layer / File(s) Summary
SKIP waiver for RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt
Adds a single SKIP line waiving TestDeepSeekV3Lite::test_auto_dtype[mtp_nextn=0-overlap_scheduler=False] on RTX_PRO_6000_Blackwell_Server_Edition, referencing bug nvbugs/6388239.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#15678: Adds SKIP entries to the same waives.txt for different failing cases in accuracy/test_disaggregated_serving.py.
  • NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#15700: Adds SKIP waivers for the same TestDeepSeekV3Lite test matrix including the mtp_nextn=0-overlap_scheduler=False case with the same nvbug reference.

Suggested reviewers

  • crazydemo
  • jieli-matrix
  • StanleySun639
  • LarryXFly
  • xinhe-nv
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title is specific and matches the PR’s waive-for-QA-CI change.
Description check ✅ Passed The description explains the bug, target branch, Jenkins run, and waived case, though it omits the template's Test Coverage and checklist details.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@xinhe-nv xinhe-nv closed this Jun 30, 2026
@xinhe-nv
xinhe-nv deleted the trtllm-ci-report/waive-20260629-024659 branch June 30, 2026 00:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants