Describe the bug
For small datasets (n_rows=100) NN Descent breaks out of the iteration loop early (after 1 iteration), and does not properly return update indices.
Specifically, this behavior happens when graph_degree=64 (but is not an issue when graph_degree=32).
After some investigation, it seems like the following if statement in update_and_sample (in raft/cpp/include/raft/neighbors/detail/nn_descent.cuh) become true immediately after 1 iteration.
if (update_counter_ < build_config_.termination_threshold * nrow_ *
build_config_.dataset_dim / counter_interval) {
update_counter_ = -1;
}
It may be worth looking into the update_graph function (in the same file) and check when whether the update_counter is being incremented properly.
This is not an issue for the current test configuration which tests for large datasets - 1000, 2000 n_rows.
Steps/Code to reproduce bug
Add the following prints to raft/cpp/test/neighbors/ann_nn_descent.cuh right before EXPECT_TRUE.
raft::print_host_vector("indices naive after build", indices_naive.data(), 5, std::cout);
raft::print_host_vector("indices nndescent after build", indices_NNDescent.data(), 5, std::cout);
EXPECT_TRUE(eval_recall(
indices_naive, indices_NNDescent, ps.n_rows, ps.graph_degree, 0.001, min_recall));
Also, change the test parameters like below by adding 100 to n_rows
const std::vector<AnnNNDescentInputs> inputs = raft::util::itertools::product<AnnNNDescentInputs>(
{100, 1000, 2000}, // n_rows
{3, 5, 7, 8, 17, 64, 128, 137, 192, 256, 512, 619, 1024}, // dim
{32, 64}, // graph_degree
{raft::distance::DistanceType::L2Expanded},
{false, true},
{0.90});
Run the test.
./cpp/build/gtests/NEIGHBORS_ANN_NN_DESCENT_TEST --gtest_filter=AnnNNDescentTest/AnnNNDescentTestI8_U32*
It can be seen that the indices are not updated properly.
indices naive=[0,21,50,60,87];
indices nndescent=[1,2,3,4,5]; // stays same
For distances (feature to be added by this PR) it also does not get updated and stays as initial FLOAT_MAX values.
dists naive after build=[0,1,13,14,27,35,35,50,56,62];
dists nndescent after build=[3.40282e+38,3.40282e+38,3.40282e+38,3.40282e+38,3.40282e+38,3.40282e+38,3.40282e+38,3.40282e+38,3.40282e+38,3.40282e+38];
indices naive after build=[0,2,49,82,61,9,67,32,13,97];
indices nndescent after build=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10];
Environment details (please complete the following information):
build in devcontainers cuda12.2-conda
Describe the bug
For small datasets (
n_rows=100) NN Descent breaks out of the iteration loop early (after 1 iteration), and does not properly return update indices.Specifically, this behavior happens when
graph_degree=64(but is not an issue whengraph_degree=32).After some investigation, it seems like the following if statement in
update_and_sample(inraft/cpp/include/raft/neighbors/detail/nn_descent.cuh) become true immediately after 1 iteration.It may be worth looking into the
update_graphfunction (in the same file) and check when whether theupdate_counteris being incremented properly.This is not an issue for the current test configuration which tests for large datasets - 1000, 2000
n_rows.Steps/Code to reproduce bug
Add the following prints to
raft/cpp/test/neighbors/ann_nn_descent.cuhright beforeEXPECT_TRUE.Also, change the test parameters like below by adding 100 to
n_rowsRun the test.
It can be seen that the indices are not updated properly.
For distances (feature to be added by this PR) it also does not get updated and stays as initial
FLOAT_MAXvalues.Environment details (please complete the following information):
build in devcontainers
cuda12.2-conda