[RFR] Readd new modules and mark the differences in module sets

[StefanRijnhart]

Follow up to the discussion from #795 about whether the module coverage list should feature the old modules from the previous release, the new modules from the new release, or both.

[pedrobaeza]

This joins the best of both worlds, so I see this correct. Maybe now modules that are the same looks not correctly indented in the table. There are 3 possible solutions for this:

• Put the icon in a new column.
• Put a blank image with the same size of the other images.
• Put the new/old image after the module name.

[pedrobaeza]

Are these icons to be correctly rendered as the definition is after?

[StefanRijnhart]

Yes, no problem.

[StefanRijnhart]

The placement is a matter of taste. None of the solutions are pretty. I tried adding the icon after the name, but I liked this better. This looks better when you look at the list in a browser tha it looks here in this screenshot, actually.

[pedrobaeza]

OK, if you prefer this way, it's not the most important thing.

[pedrobaeza]

There's still the question of renamed modules. I think here we have hr_equipment > maintenance.

[hbrunn]

for the renamed modules, I'd suggest a different PR. Merging this one