Skip to content

[MIG][10.0][datetime_formatter] Migration - #872

Merged
pedrobaeza merged 4 commits into
OCA:10.0from
Tecnativa:10.0-datetime_formatter
Jun 29, 2017
Merged

[MIG][10.0][datetime_formatter] Migration #872
pedrobaeza merged 4 commits into
OCA:10.0from
Tecnativa:10.0-datetime_formatter

Conversation

@yajo

@yajo yajo commented Jun 22, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Special highlights:

  • Fixed some license headers.
  • Adhered to normal addon structure.
  • Removed exceptions.py and use UserError instead.
  • Allow submodules to import some constants from main namespace.

The rest is basically a standard migration.

@Tecnativa

Jairo Llopis and others added 4 commits June 22, 2017 12:25
This module allows the developer to format any date/time combination in
the most comfortable way for the user, just with a quick call to
Special highlights:

- Fixed some license headers.
- Adhered to normal addon structure.
- Removed `exceptions.py` and use `UserError` instead.
- Allow submodules to import some constants from main namespace.

The rest is basically a standard migration.
@yajo yajo self-assigned this Jun 22, 2017
@yajo yajo added this to the 10.0 milestone Jun 22, 2017
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2017
63 tasks

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe you can remove Grupo ESOC from this version...

@chienandalu chienandalu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@pedrobaeza
pedrobaeza merged commit 017b48f into OCA:10.0 Jun 29, 2017
@pedrobaeza
pedrobaeza deleted the 10.0-datetime_formatter branch June 29, 2017 00:22
SiesslPhillip pushed a commit to grueneerde/OCA-server-tools that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
Syncing from upstream OCA/server-tools (14.0)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants