Description
When generating interfaces using the oneOf discriminator keyword, the generator produces both the correct subtype annotations, and also incorrect annotations that incorrectly match the names of the openapi spec schemas, not the generated objects. I’m think this is because of a bug, but it could be because we’ve incorrectly written the spec. I have run this through the spec validator successfully, however.
What is produced:
@JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME, include = JsonTypeInfo.As.PROPERTY, property = "petType", visible = true)
@JsonSubTypes({
@JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Cat.class, name = "Cat"),
@JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Dog.class, name = "Dog"),
@JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Lizard.class, name = "Lizard"),
@JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Cat.class, name = "cat"),
@JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Dog.class, name = "dog"),
@JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Lizard.class, name = "lizard")
})
What is expected:
@JsonSubTypes({
@JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Cat.class, name = "cat"),
@JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Dog.class, name = "dog"),
@JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Lizard.class, name = "lizard")
})
When useOneOfInterfaces is false, the annotations are correct, but Pet is not generated as an interface.
Removing discriminator mapping removes the correct subtypes, leaving only the incorrect subtypes.
openapi-generator version
Latest/6.5
OpenAPI declaration file content or url
See here for the example yml:
example_petstore.yml
Command line used for generation
docker run --rm -v "${PWD}:/input" -v "${PWD}:/output" openapitools/openapi-generator-cli:latest generate `
-g spring `
--library spring-boot `
-i /input/example_petstore.yml `
-o /output `
--model-package com.petstore.spec `
--additional-properties=delegatePattern=true,interfaceOnly=false,defaultInterfaces=false,java8=true,dateLibrary=java8,hideGenerationTimestamp=true,useOneOfInterfaces=true
Steps to reproduce
Download or clone the above yml file into a clean directory. Run the docker command above while in that directory.
Related issues/PRs
Some related issues and PRs I have noted that are on the Java generator:
[BUG][JAVA] AllOf with mapping generates wrong JsonSubTypes annotations · Issue #14917 · OpenAPITools/openapi-generator
allow to specify the useOneOfInterfaces option for java by robbertvanwaveren · Pull Request #15042 · OpenAPITools/openapi-generator
Do not add schema / class name mapping where custom mapping exists #14984
Suggest a fix/enhancement
I am able to spend some time fixing this at work, but would need some guidance from someone more familiar with the project on a good place to start
Description
When generating interfaces using the oneOf discriminator keyword, the generator produces both the correct subtype annotations, and also incorrect annotations that incorrectly match the names of the openapi spec schemas, not the generated objects. I’m think this is because of a bug, but it could be because we’ve incorrectly written the spec. I have run this through the spec validator successfully, however.
What is produced:
What is expected:
When useOneOfInterfaces is false, the annotations are correct, but Pet is not generated as an interface.
Removing discriminator mapping removes the correct subtypes, leaving only the incorrect subtypes.
openapi-generator version
Latest/6.5
OpenAPI declaration file content or url
See here for the example yml:
example_petstore.yml
Command line used for generation
Steps to reproduce
Download or clone the above yml file into a clean directory. Run the docker command above while in that directory.
Related issues/PRs
Some related issues and PRs I have noted that are on the Java generator:
[BUG][JAVA] AllOf with mapping generates wrong JsonSubTypes annotations · Issue #14917 · OpenAPITools/openapi-generator
allow to specify the useOneOfInterfaces option for java by robbertvanwaveren · Pull Request #15042 · OpenAPITools/openapi-generator
Do not add schema / class name mapping where custom mapping exists #14984
Suggest a fix/enhancement
I am able to spend some time fixing this at work, but would need some guidance from someone more familiar with the project on a good place to start