-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
Add PR template #991
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add PR template #991
Changes from 1 commit
06ad52f
86fd07c
a6f232b
a80aa84
6da4a59
4a11f65
b2d5724
b7d1f0f
533df6e
186e4ed
99cf1db
87999b4
610b258
ad2ea01
2e53a22
10f93ca
ade899d
db6e1b9
da1a517
72863e6
85c531c
12129a7
65288f1
982a7be
21de932
a97a355
a96c726
e89adde
503ed7e
59e39ed
2723749
cd4e732
3207141
7ec5969
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
- Loading branch information
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ Hardware (GPU/CPU): | |
| [ ] Script tested as a regular phoenicis user and working (if you have a problem -> draft and ask for help) | ||
| [ ] json-align and eslint run accorded to the . | ||
|
|
||
| Codacy and travis must run perfectly for the Pr to be reviewed. You can however ping them if you think there is a problem with those tools (use draft for this). | ||
| Codacy and travis must run perfectly for the PR to be reviewed. You can ping reviewers if you think there is a problem with those tools (use draft for this). | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The last sentence is not clear for me.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What happens if travis fails without any reason for example.
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I see. Nevertheless, I'm not sure the approach is useful because as far as I know Travis and Codacy will not run for draft pull requests. So you would have to set the PR to draft after one of the checks fail. That doesn't make too much sense in my opinion. Apart from that, everybody would have to remove the remark from the description because it doesn't really belong to the description. Therefore I would rather go for the checklist only.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I would like to at least keep an info about codacy and travis to be checked because it is really annoying to always remind to someone "Please check travis and codacy".
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ok but this could also be a point of the checklist, right? |
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
according to the README?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should be a link.