Added support for ReScript#3435
Conversation
JS File Size Changes (gzipped)A total of 3 files have changed, with a combined diff of +815 B (+16.1%). Details
|
RunDevelopment
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for the PR @vmarcosp!
I gave the language a quick review and found a few things.
|
@RunDevelopment some tests are broken, I'll fix and ping you back soon. |
|
🔥🔥🔥 |
Take your time. I'm currently reading through the docs, so I'll probably add a few more comments. |
|
Could we also add support for ReScript's char syntax? It could be done like this: 'comment': /.../,
'char': { pattern: /'.'/, greedy: true },
// ...Also, chars seem to be heavily discouraged in the docs. Will this be removed eventually? The syntax does seem to somewhat overlap with generics. |
Looks nice, I'll add. |
|
Another nice feature would be to highlight boolean literals. Please add |
|
I have a question about regexes. Is |
|
|
Are all PPX of the form |
There are three forms of ppx:
|
Sounds good. Then let's highlight |
|
The coverage CI test is currently failing because:
|
I'm running the tests locally just to make sure that everything is passing |
Some parts of the CI aren't part of |
RunDevelopment
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, @vmarcosp! I think the language is ready to go. Please run npm run build to make the CI and then I'll merge this.
Thanks for your help 😄 |
|
@RunDevelopment is there an estimate for the next release that includes these changes? |
|
Probably this weekend. |
|
Oh, great! Tks |
|
I almost forgot, but since this pr is merged I think you can close this issue #3094 |
Added support for ReScript