Update documentation for analysis creation - #107
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe documentation adds a demo-instance guide, updates installation verification, revises the analysis workflow, and changes user sidebar routes. ChangesDocumentation workflows
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@src/guide/user/analysis.md`:
- Around line 22-35: Update the documentation around the “Approval,” “Build
Analysis,” “Distribute Analysis,” and “Execution” sections to make approval an
explicit prerequisite before building, either by moving the Approval section
before Step 4 or clearly labeling it as a prerequisite. Revise the Execution
text to state that nodes can start only after approval, a successful build, and
distribution.
In `@src/guide/user/demo.md`:
- Around line 1-19: Remove the Markdown comment-syntax scratchpad at the start
of the guide, including the HTML comment and all reference-definition examples,
so the document begins with Demo Instance workflow content; do not replace it
with unrelated documentation.
- Line 81: Remove the stale TODO comment in the documentation near the
analysis.md reference, since src/guide/user/analysis.md has been updated. Do not
replace it unless there is a specific current, actionable task to record.
- Around line 50-53: Update the preparation step heading and description around
the project workflow so they match the sidebar’s “Submitting a Project Proposal”
terminology and state that a proposal is required before creating an analysis.
Keep the link aligned with the documented proposal-submission workflow, or
explicitly explain when the project becomes available for analysis.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 5baa19f4-bccf-4158-80dd-45b18f47f80c
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
src/public/images/ui_images/analysis_distribution.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/public/images/ui_images/analysis_start.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/public/images/ui_images/hub_add_analysis_from_proposal.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/.vitepress/routes/sidebar/user.tssrc/guide/deployment/node-installation.mdsrc/guide/user/analysis.mdsrc/guide/user/demo.md
basiert auf PR #106
Summary by CodeRabbit