Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 03eaccf in 49 seconds
More details
- Looked at
54lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docs/api-reference/evaluations.mdx:44
- Draft comment:
Changed param description to 'random samples'. Consider expanding if randomness has specific implications. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =30%<= threshold50%
The comment suggests expanding the description if randomness has specific implications. This is a suggestion to ensure clarity, but it doesn't directly ask for a code change or point out a specific issue. It seems to be more of a suggestion for clarity rather than a necessary change.
2. docs/api-reference/run-management.mdx:121
- Draft comment:
Ensure file ends with a newline consistently. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%
None
3. docs/api-reference/users.mdx:4
- Draft comment:
Include 'chatbots' in description; verify it aligns with actual endpoint behavior. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%
The comment is asking the PR author to update the PR description and verify alignment with endpoint behavior. This violates the rule against asking for PR description updates and ensuring behavior is intended.
4. docs/api-reference/evaluations.mdx:44
- Draft comment:
Clarifies 'num_samples' as using random sampling. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
5. docs/api-reference/run-management.mdx:124
- Draft comment:
Removed trailing whitespace after closing code block for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
6. docs/api-reference/users.mdx:4
- Draft comment:
Including 'chatbots' improves clarity on deployment context. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
7. docs/api-reference/users.mdx:115
- Draft comment:
Removed trailing whitespace in response spec for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
Workflow ID: wflow_uckVYYjWATMtuBRO
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
Refines API documentation by clarifying sample randomness in evaluations and updating user management descriptions.
num_samplesinEvalRunRequestas "Number of random samples to evaluate" inevaluations.mdx.users.mdx.evaluations.mdx,run-management.mdx, andusers.mdx.This description was created by
for 03eaccf. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.