Morning @mmcky and @AakashGfude ,
I find another issue that the numbering for some lists in normal lecture contexts can be problematic:
- in source files, we just number some lists with
1. ...., 1. ..., 1. ..., etc.
- but when they are converted into IPYNB and HTML files, they look differently: IPYNB (still
1. ...., 1. ..., 1. ..., etc.) vs HTML (1. ...., 2. ..., 3. ..., etc.)
For example, please see the lecture getting_started here:

I also notice this issue in some other lectures in basic and advanced lectures.
Do you think it is a better idea to modify the source files directly or do something in the converting job?
Morning @mmcky and @AakashGfude ,
I find another issue that the numbering for some lists in normal lecture contexts can be problematic:
1. ....,1. ...,1. ..., etc.1. ....,1. ...,1. ..., etc.) vs HTML (1. ....,2. ...,3. ..., etc.)For example, please see the lecture getting_started here:

I also notice this issue in some other lectures in basic and advanced lectures.
Do you think it is a better idea to modify the source files directly or do something in the converting job?