Skip to content

[IPYNB_vs_HTML]_numbering_for_lists_in_normal_lecture_contexts #114

Description

@shlff

Morning @mmcky and @AakashGfude ,

I find another issue that the numbering for some lists in normal lecture contexts can be problematic:

  • in source files, we just number some lists with 1. ...., 1. ..., 1. ..., etc.
  • but when they are converted into IPYNB and HTML files, they look differently: IPYNB (still 1. ...., 1. ..., 1. ..., etc.) vs HTML (1. ...., 2. ..., 3. ..., etc.)

For example, please see the lecture getting_started here:
Screen Shot 2020-12-07 at 8 34 00 am

I also notice this issue in some other lectures in basic and advanced lectures.

Do you think it is a better idea to modify the source files directly or do something in the converting job?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions