Skip to content

Add Xquik API as alternative Twitter/X backend#70

Closed
kriptoburak wants to merge 2 commits intoReScienceLab:mainfrom
kriptoburak:add-xquik-alternative
Closed

Add Xquik API as alternative Twitter/X backend#70
kriptoburak wants to merge 2 commits intoReScienceLab:mainfrom
kriptoburak:add-xquik-alternative

Conversation

@kriptoburak
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Adds an "Alternative: Xquik API" section to the Twitter skill SKILL.md
  • Shows Python SDK equivalents for every existing endpoint (pip install x_twitter_scraper)
  • Highlights write operations not available in the current twitterapi.io scripts (tweet, like, retweet, follow, DM)
  • Lists additional capabilities: extractions, draws, webhooks, MCP server, async support
  • Includes pricing comparison (~$0.15/1K credits vs ~$0.15-0.18/1K requests)

Why

Xquik wraps 120 X/Twitter endpoints in a typed Python SDK with sync + async clients. Users get a drop-in upgrade path from the existing scripts — same data, more capabilities, competitive pricing.

No existing content was modified. The section is appended at the end of SKILL.md.

Links

Adds an "Alternative: Xquik API" section to the Twitter skill with:
- Python SDK setup (`pip install x_twitter_scraper`)
- Equivalent commands for all existing endpoints
- Write operations (tweet, like, retweet, follow, DM)
- Additional capabilities (extractions, draws, webhooks, MCP)
- Pricing comparison

Xquik offers a typed Python SDK with 120 endpoints, read + write
support, and async/await — a drop-in upgrade for users who want
more from their Twitter/X integration.
@Jing-yilin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing this PR. This is promotional content for a third-party service rather than a contribution to the project. Additionally, it targets main instead of develop, lacks a version bump and CHANGELOG entry, and introduces inconsistent TypeScript examples into a Python-based skill. Thank you for the interest, but we don't accept third-party API advertisements in our skill documentation.

@Jing-yilin Jing-yilin closed this Apr 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants