feat: added API contract for the new PATCH endpoints - #235
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe documentation for the Todo Backend API was updated to add a new PATCH endpoint Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API_Server
Client->>API_Server: PATCH /v1/tasks/{taskId} (partial task fields)
API_Server-->>Client: 200 Success (updated task details)
API_Server-->>Client: 400 Bad Request (invalid ID or validation error)
API_Server-->>Client: 404 Not Found (task does not exist)
API_Server-->>Client: 500 Internal Server Error
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
todo-backend/README.md (1)
244-262:⚠️ Potential issueCorrect JSON syntax in the 400 error example
The JSON block is invalid—there’s no comma after"validation_failed", and markdownlint flags a missing blank line before the fenced block (MD031).@@ -244,7 +244,9 @@ - **Code:** 400 - - **Content:** - ```json + - **Content:** + + ```json { - "status": "validation_failed" + "status": "validation_failed", "statusCode": 400, "errorMessage": "Validation Error", "errors": [ @@ -253,6 +255,7 @@ { "field": "<string>", "message": "<string>" } ] } + ```
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
todo-backend/README.md(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
todo-backend/README.md
269-269: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
313-313: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
438-438: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Co-authored-by: graphite-app[bot] <96075541+graphite-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date:
June 1, 2025Developer Name: @Achintya-Chatterjee
Issue Ticket Number
/tasks/{task_id}/API to update a specific task todo-backend#30PATCH /v1/tasks/{taskId}?action=deferAPI to defer a specific task todo-backend#55Description
PATCH /v1/tasks/{taskId}for partially updating a taskPATCH /v1/tasks/{taskId}?action=deferfor deffering a taskDocumentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Screenshot 1
Test Coverage
Screenshot 1
Additional Notes
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add API contract details for new PATCH endpoints to allow partial updates and deferment of tasks in the
todo-backendREADME.Why are these changes being made?
These changes are being introduced to document the new functionality that allows for more flexible task management by enabling partial updates and deferring tasks through the API. This approach enhances the backend capabilities by providing users with more options to interact with tasks while ensuring all necessary information is clearly defined for these new operations.