Skip to content

Lock file maintenance#799

Open
KubeArchitectBot wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/docs-lock-file-maintenance
Open

Lock file maintenance#799
KubeArchitectBot wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/docs-lock-file-maintenance

Conversation

@KubeArchitectBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@KubeArchitectBot KubeArchitectBot commented Dec 8, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am on monday"
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

@railway-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

railway-app Bot commented Dec 8, 2025

This PR was not deployed automatically as @KubeArchitectBot does not have access to the Railway project.

In order to get automatic PR deploys, please add @KubeArchitectBot to your workspace on Railway.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cloudflare-workers-and-pages Bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Deploying with  Cloudflare Workers  Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

Status Name Latest Commit Updated (UTC)
❌ Deployment failed
View logs
leaflock 60504ff Dec 08 2025, 12:54 AM

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the chore Maintenance, refactor, or non-feature changes label Dec 8, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Dec 8, 2025

MegaLinter analysis: Error

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Warnings Elapsed time
❌ BASH shellcheck 10 1 1 0.84s
✅ DOCKERFILE hadolint 3 0 0 0.36s
✅ JSON jsonlint 18 0 0 0.55s
✅ MARKDOWN markdownlint 33 2 0 0 2.84s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no no 6.93s
⚠️ SQL sqlfluff 2 0 1 0 5.32s
✅ YAML yamllint 51 0 0 5.67s

Detailed Issues

❌ BASH / shellcheck - 1 error
warning: In POSIX sh, string indexing is undefined.
    ┌─ frontend/docker-entrypoint.sh:219:49
    │
219 │     log "✅ Injected VITE_CLERK_PUBLISHABLE_KEY (${VITE_CLERK_PUBLISHABLE_KEY:0:20}...)"
    │                                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    │
    = SC3057
    = For more information: https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC3057

warning: 1 warnings emitted
⚠️ SQL / sqlfluff - 1 error
WARNING: Config file .github/linters/.sqlfluff set a deprecated config value `rules:max_line_length`. This will be removed in a later release. This has been mapped to `max_line_length` set to a value of 120 for this run. Please update your configuration to remove this warning. 

The max_line_length config has moved from sqlfluff:rules to the root sqlfluff level.

See https://docs.sqlfluff.com/en/stable/perma/configuration.html for more details.

==== finding fixable violations ====
WARNING    Rule configuration contain a section for unexpected rule 'L010'. These values will be ignored. 
WARNING    The reference was however found as a match for rule CP01 with name 'capitalisation.keywords'. SQLFluff assumes configuration for this rule will be specified in 'sqlfluff:rules:capitalisation.keywords'. 
WARNING    Rule configuration contain a section for unexpected rule 'L014'. These values will be ignored. 
WARNING    The reference was however found as a match for rule CP02 with name 'capitalisation.identifiers'. SQLFluff assumes configuration for this rule will be specified in 'sqlfluff:rules:capitalisation.identifiers'. 
WARNING    Rule configuration contain a section for unexpected rule 'L030'. These values will be ignored. 
WARNING    The reference was however found as a match for rule CP03 with name 'capitalisation.functions'. SQLFluff assumes configuration for this rule will be specified in 'sqlfluff:rules:capitalisation.functions'. 
== [backend/config/postgres_security.sql] FAIL
L:   5 | P:   1 |  PRS | Line 5, Position 1: Found unparsable section: 'ALTER
                       | SYSTEM SET ssl = on;\nALTER SYSTEM ...'
WARNING    Rule configuration contain a section for unexpected rule 'L010'. These values will be ignored. 
WARNING    The reference was however found as a match for rule CP01 with name 'capitalisation.keywords'. SQLFluff assumes configuration for this rule will be specified in 'sqlfluff:rules:capitalisation.keywords'. 
WARNING    Rule configuration contain a section for unexpected rule 'L014'. These values will be ignored. 
WARNING    The reference was however found as a match for rule CP02 with name 'capitalisation.identifiers'. SQLFluff assumes configuration for this rule will be specified in 'sqlfluff:rules:capitalisation.identifiers'. 
WARNING    Rule configuration contain a section for unexpected rule 'L030'. These values will be ignored. 
WARNING    The reference was however found as a match for rule CP03 with name 'capitalisation.functions'. SQLFluff assumes configuration for this rule will be specified in 'sqlfluff:rules:capitalisation.functions'. 
==== no fixable linting violations found ====
All Finished!
==== lint for unfixable violations ====
== [backend/config/postgres_security.sql] PASS
== [backend/scripts/reset-mfa.sql] PASS

See detailed reports in MegaLinter artifacts

You could have the same capabilities but better runtime performances if you use a MegaLinter flavor:

Your project could benefit from a custom flavor, which would allow you to run only the linters you need, and thus improve runtime performances. (Skip this info by defining FLAVOR_SUGGESTIONS: false)

  • Documentation: Custom Flavors
  • Command: npx mega-linter-runner@9.2.0 --custom-flavor-setup --custom-flavor-linters BASH_SHELLCHECK,DOCKERFILE_HADOLINT,JSON_JSONLINT,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWNLINT,REPOSITORY_SECRETLINT,SQL_SQLFLUFF,YAML_YAMLLINT

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security

@KubeArchitectBot KubeArchitectBot changed the title chore(deps): lock file maintenance Lock file maintenance Apr 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

chore Maintenance, refactor, or non-feature changes Lang JS SemVer lockFileMaintenance

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant