Make impl_modulus! usable from external crates#172
Conversation
df75075 to
26de13e
Compare
mikelodder7
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense. Nothing else better we could do than define macros to create constants?
|
Not for now. When const generics improve we can get rid of the macros. |
I would vote for making the Edit: on a second thought, in many cases we don't even need the |
|
@haslersn can you add a test to the Otherwise I'd say this is fine and we can circle back on the |
4c19d46 to
caed55f
Compare
|
Should now be all done including the
|
|
@haslersn hmm, I don't see the test? |
Previously it was impossible to use `impl_modulus!` in crates that use crypto-bigint, because certain functions were only available within the crypto-bigint crate.
caed55f to
9375343
Compare
Oops, |
|
@haslersn think you still need to push the changes |
|
No, they were pushed just before my previous comment |
|
Oh sorry, didn’t refresh |
Previously it was impossible to use
impl_modulus!in crates that use crypto-bigint, because certain functions were only available within the crypto-bigint crate.