[autobackport: sssd-2-10] refactoring ipa tests for hostname framework changes.

[sssd-bot]

This is an automatic backport of PR#8611 refactoring ipa tests for hostname framework changes. to branch sssd-2-10, created by @danlavu.

Caution

@danlavu The patches did not apply cleanly. It is necessary to resolve conflicts before merging this pull request. Commits that introduced conflict are marked with CONFLICT!.

You can push changes to this pull request

git remote add sssd-bot git@github.com:sssd-bot/sssd.git
git fetch sssd-bot refs/heads/SSSD-sssd-backport-pr8611-to-sssd-2-10
git checkout SSSD-sssd-backport-pr8611-to-sssd-2-10
git push sssd-bot SSSD-sssd-backport-pr8611-to-sssd-2-10 --force

---

Original commits
8f170d0 - refactoring ipa tests for hostname framework changes.

Backported commits

• 23a2ac3 - CONFLICT! refactoring ipa tests for hostname framework changes.

Conflicting Files Information (check for deleted and re-added files)

• CONFLICT! refactoring ipa tests for hostname framework changes.

On branch SSSD-sssd-backport-pr8611-to-sssd-2-10
You are currently cherry-picking commit 8f170d08a.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   src/tests/system/tests/test_ipa.py

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

---

Original Pull Request Body

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request refactors IPA system tests to utilize the hostname framework, replacing hardcoded hostnames with dynamic references across various test cases. It also introduces a new test for verifying ID view overrides during email lookups. A critical issue was identified where unresolved Git conflict markers were left in the code, which will cause a syntax error during execution.

[jakub-vavra-cz]

LGTM

[justin-stephenson]

@danlavu Several ipa system tests still fail here, do you know why?

[danlavu]

@justin-stephenson, @alexey-tikhonov brought it up that we haven't been able to build centos-stream, so it doesn't have the keytab from sssd-ci-containers. I'll ping you.

[justin-stephenson]

@justin-stephenson, @alexey-tikhonov brought it up that we haven't been able to build centos-stream, so it doesn't have the keytab from sssd-ci-containers. I'll ping you.

C10s build should be fixed now, let me re-run the system tests

[danlavu]

rerunning c10, will merge if it passes.

[sssd-bot]

The pull request was accepted by @jakub-vavra-cz with the following PR CI status:

---

🟢 CodeQL (success)
🟢 rpm-build:centos-stream-10-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 testing-farm:centos-stream-10-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 ci / prepare (success)
🟢 ci / system (centos-10) (success)
🟢 Static code analysis / codeql (success)
🟢 Static code analysis / pre-commit (success)
🟢 Static code analysis / python-system-tests (success)

---

There are unsuccessful or unfinished checks. Make sure that the failures are not related to this pull request before merging.