Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Merging without review because this doesn't change anything in the built docs. |
Contributor
Author
|
@PierreQuinton Note that we will have to think about adding |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The idea here is to stop using a bare
:members:(that asks to document every member) and then opt out members that we don't want to appear, and instead add:member:with only members that we want to appear. So this doesn't change anything but makes things easier to maintain (do not have to opt out for every little member that no one should care about).In a future PR I'll add
__call__to:members:so that we can also have a doc entry for this very important function.