Add draft for KaaS LB standard (#169) - #648
Conversation
* Add draft for KaaS LB standard Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Rework large chunks of the record Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Add Decision section again; Fix typo etc. Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Fix conformance tests wording Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Fix strong wording Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Add section about OpenStacks CCM defaults Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Change wording Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Requests->Connections Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Add ref implementation hint Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Make decision items more conformant to each other Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Minor wording changes/additions Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Reword logging/... Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Clarify Option 1 Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Improve wording Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Add another option Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * More clear wording in options Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Address review Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Treat PROXY protocol and HTTP headers as options of the same category Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Fix indentation Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> * Select option regarding "Local" policy Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de> --------- Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <muehlfort@gonicus.de>
Small grammar adjustments and fixes. Signed-off-by: Hannes Baum <hannes.baum@cloudandheat.com>
Fixes to please the linter. Signed-off-by: Hannes Baum <hannes.baum@cloudandheat.com>
|
I recall that the type of the record was the topic of discussion in #169 - whether this should be a "Decision Record" or "Standard". I guess that changing the type in the header section to "Standard" would already bring this document mostly in line with other standard documents like #658 - regarding formal aspects as well as value for CSP's/users. |
|
Unassigning myself due to end of work package... |
|
@cah-hbaum we are currently trying to close stale PRs and i this one looks like it has not moved in a while. Is this still being worked on? What are the next steps here? |
|
Given that there seems to be limited interest of the community to work on this presently, I will close this for now. Once we find somebody who wants to work on this, we can reopen the PR and continue from here. Thank you for the work so far @cah-hbaum, I hope someone will continue it. |
Follow-Up PR to #169
Everything still relevant will be discussed in here now.